透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.220.178.207
  • 學位論文

韓國和臺灣的研究與發展之差異分析比較

Understanding the Differences of Research and Development Between Korea and Taiwan

指導教授 : 陳彥行
共同指導教授 : 顏汝芳(Sherry Yen)

摘要


本研究調查韓國與臺灣的研究與發展的差異,資料來自於經濟合作暨發展組織(OECD)、Worldscope的產業資料、臺灣經濟期刊與一份調查個人對韓國與臺灣的產業發展看法。結果顯示兩個國家有許多的共通處,主要的差異來自於兩國頂尖企業投入研究與發展的數量。我們發現在韓國主要在研究與發展的銷售總額是來自於五大公司,然而臺灣則是來自於前二十大的公司。此外,跟臺灣比較,韓國在研究與發展所投入的資金使用在電子產業更為有效率。

並列摘要


We investigate the difference between Korean research and development and Taiwan’s research and development. We examine data from the OECD, industry data from Worldscope and the Taiwan Economic Journal, and even include a survey to better understand individual perceptions of Korea and Taiwan. We find that research and development in both countries have a lot of similarities, but the key difference resides in the amount of research and development done by the top companies in each nation. We find that the majority of research and development in Korea is conducted by the top 5 firms in total sales whereas Taiwan’s research and development is more distributed between the top 20 firms in total sales. In addition, we find that Korea’s usage of funds for research and development is more efficient in the electronics industry than Taiwan’s.

參考文獻


[1] Athukorala, P. C. (2009). The rise of China and East Asian export performance: Is the crowding‐out fear warranted?. The World Economy,32(2), 234-266.
[4] Kim, E. M. (1996). The industrial organization and growth of the Korean chaebol: integrating development and organizational theories. Asian business networks, (64), 231.
[5] Kim, W. S., Lyn, E., Park, T. J., & Zychowicz, E. (2005). The wealth effects of capital investment decisions: An empirical comparison of Korean chaebol and non‐chaebol firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(5‐6), 945-971.
[7] Lee, M., Son, B., & Om, K. (1996). Evaluation of national R&D projects in Korea. Research policy, 25(5), 805-818.
[9] Sakakibara, M., & Cho, D. S. (2002). Cooperative R&D in Japan and Korea: a comparison of industrial policy. Research Policy, 31(5), 673-692.

延伸閱讀