透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.218.62
  • 學位論文

以加入相關而未被引用專利建構進階專利引用網路

Constructing an Enhanced Patent Citation Network by Adding Unused Relevant Patents

指導教授 : 陳達仁
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


專利引文分析是以專利間引用關係做為分析的基礎,如:專利品質衡量、知識流及知識外溢、技術發展及產業趨勢分析等。發明人於研發專利期間做先前技藝搜尋,將相關的先前研究技術記載為引用資料,然而,專利引用延遲時間會造成高度相關的專利資訊無法被註記為引用資料。本篇論文旨在於利用書目耦合關係(BC, bibliographical coupling)及柏拉圖原則(Pareto principle)找出相關而未被引用專利,部分遺漏的專利引用關係可以透過加入相關而未被引用專利補足,在考慮這些相關而未被引用專利後,便能建構一個進階專利引用網路。本論文中,專利引用網路及進階專利引用網路以兩層面作為研究討論基礎,即專利層面以及專利權人層面。在建構進階專利引用網路後,利用費里曼點中間中心度(Freeman vertex betweenness centrality)及強森的層級叢集分析(Johnson’s hierarchical clustering)探討兩網路的變化及差異。本論文以有機發光二極體照明技術(lighting emitting diode illuminating technology)作為衡量研究方法可行性的研究個案,研究結果顯示,確實能夠經由加入相關而未被引用專利呈現一個更廣泛的專利關係。

並列摘要


The patent citation analyses rely on the citations between patents, including quality of patents, knowledge flow and spillover, technology development and industrial trend. The inventors record relevant information as prior art but not all the relevant prior studies would be cited as references. Some highly relevant patents may be unused for the citation time lag (CTL). This paper used the bibliographical coupling (BC) and Pareto principle to identify the unused relevant patents (URP). Some of the missing citation links can then be made up by adding the URP and an enhanced patent citation network (EPCN) can be constructed by taking the URP into account. The patent citation network (PCN) and EPCN were discussed at patent and assignee level in this paper. The differences between the two networks were studied through the Freeman vertex betweenness centrality and the Johnson’s hierarchical clustering. The light emitting diode (LED) illuminating technology was chosen for case study in this paper in order to demonstrate the feasibility of the research methodology. As shown in this work, the relationship between patents can be enhanced by adding the URP.

參考文獻


Atallah G. and Rodriguez G., 2006, “Indirect patent citations,” Scientometrics, 67(3): 437-465.
Case D.O. and Higgins G.M., 2000, “How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7): 635-645.
Cleverdon C.W., 1967, “The Cranfield tests on index language devices,” Aslib Proceedings, 19(6): 173-194.
Freeman L.C., 1977, “A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness,” Sociometry, 40(1): 35-41.
Harter S.P., 1971, “The Cranfield II relevance assessments: A critical evaluation,” The Library Quarterly, 41(3): 229-243.

延伸閱讀