透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.15.229.113
  • 學位論文

臺灣宗教財團法人監督制度之變革與發展

The Transformation and Development of the Supervision System of Taiwan Religion Corporation

指導教授 : 邱榮舉教授

摘要


現行的法制要求教會(堂)應依民法之規定,成立宗教財團法人,其性質上屬他律法人,故不得設立信徒代表大會或其他類似組織,作為該財團法人之意思機關或最高權力機關,惟如此之組織制度設計,背離了各宗教教派的傳統。因此本研究針對臺灣宗教財團法人之監督制度研討,並從憲法所賦與人民的信仰宗教自由的權利內涵,檢視政府監督下所產生之相關問題並提出對策。 本論文採新制度主義研究途徑,並以文獻分析法及佐以專訪宗教學者、宗教人士及政府官員之深度訪談法,探討:第一、國家立法管理宗教團體,朝幫助宗教財團法人解決問題之方向制定,則無侵犯宗教自由之虞。第二、訂定法律作為宗教財團法人之設立依據,以保障其權利義務。第三、由目的事業主管機關單獨主管宗教財團法人以解決雙頭馬車之監督問題。第四、開放宗教財團法人之組織型態,由其依各宗教教制設計。第五、政府對於宗教財團法人之人事資格不設條件,還其人事自治權。第六、政府對宗教財團法人之財產監督管制強度應合於必要性。第七、政府官員應置專職人員,以解決專業智能與業務不連貫的問題。第八、建議未來宗教財團法人之法制,應採內政部草擬之宗教團體法(草案)。第九、建議宗教團體法(草案)採納法人間合併之制度。第十、建議宗教團體法(草案)中應讓補辦登記寺廟得以轉化為宗教法人。 值此財團法人及宗教團體法制建立之時,有關宗教財團組織之內涵與形成,我國學說及實務界應對財團發展歷史作一清楚的理解,並且讓其宗教既有組織之需要,自由組成其組織型態,方得解決宗教財團法人發展上面臨的,俗務系統的董事會,因其代表財團法人,反倒不聽從其聖務系統的教會內部組織之命,而由少數的董事控制宗教財團法人之困境。本論文對臺灣宗教財團法人監督制度,提出野人現曝的意見,或不成熟,尚請 各方指正。 關鍵字:宗教、財團法人、教會、宗教團體法草案、財團法人法草案

並列摘要


Current legal system demands the churches should establish the religion corporations under the civil law. The corporations are regulated by the law and thus they may not establish disciple delegate union or other similar organization to be the governing body or the highest governing body of the corporation. However, such legal framework of the system is against the traditions of all religions. Therefore, this research focuses on the supervision system of the religion corporations in Taiwan and examines the related problems posed under the supervision of the government, derived from the right and meaning of religious beliefs freedom endowed to the people by the constitution. The research also proposes responding strategies. The thesis adopts new system doctrine research methods to conduct it. It is also assisted by an analytical research method of past literature and deep analysis interviews with religious scholars, religious people and government officials. The research discusses the following topics: 1. If the government makes laws towards the direction to govern religious groups and help corporations solve their problems, then there's no doubt of infringement of religion freedom. 2. Government legislate as the basis of the religion corporations establishment to protect their rights and obligations. 3. The religion corporations should be supervised only by the competent authority to solve the problems of dual supervision . 4. The organization types of the religion corporations should be depended on each religion. 5. The government should not restrict the qualification of personnel of the religion corporations and should endow them the personnel autonomy. 6. The government's supervision and governance drgree on the properties of religion corporations should conform to the necessity. 7. The government should assign professionals to solve the problems of professionalism and inconsistent affairs. 8. It is suggested that the future legal system of the religion corporations should adopt the (draft) Religious Group Act made by the Ministry of the Interior. 9. It is suggested that the(draft) Religious Group Act should adopt the merger system among the corporations. 10. It is suggested that the(draft) Religious Group Act should allow the make-up registration temples to be able to transform into religion corporations. At the time when the corporations and the religious group legal systems are being made, about the meaning and formation of the religion corporation organization, the academia and those who practise the affairs should comprehend clearly of the developing history of the corporation,and let the established religion organizations freely organize their organization types according to their needs. It will be able to solve the problems of which those corporations face about the board of directors, the representatives of the corporation, don't obey the order of the internal church organization of the holy system, and thus cause the difficult situation of the few directors control the religion corporation. The thesis proposes superficial opinions to the supervision system of the religion corporations in Taiwan. My view is not well-thought-out. Please oblige me with your comments on the inappropriate places. Keywords:Religion, corporation, church, religious group act draft, corporation act draft.

參考文獻


江明修、陳定銘,1999,〈我國基金會之問題與健全之道〉,《中國行政評論》,第8卷,第3期,頁38。
官有垣,2000,〈非營利組織在臺灣的發展:兼論政府對財團法人基金會的法令規範〉,《中國行政評論》,第10卷,第1期,頁75-110。
林宗材,1994,〈公法人概念之研究〉,東海大學法律研究所碩士論文。
張永明,2000,〈從司法院大法官會議第四九○號解釋論宗教法立法〉,台北:真理大學第二屆宗教與行政學術研討會。
張永明,2004,〈政府對宗教組織之財產管理─評司法院大法官釋字第五七三號解釋〉,台北:真理大學財經學院2004學術研討會。

被引用紀錄


蔡秀菁(2013)。政教互動與宗教團體自由權限—『宗教團體法草案』個案研究(1997-2012)〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0801201418031608

延伸閱讀