摘要
本研究以Pérignon and Smith（2008）所提的多變量涵蓋機率檢定，作為回溯測試（Backtesting）的主要架構，以確認最佳的風險值估計方法。多變量涵蓋機率檢定是利用相同期間，不同的涵蓋機率或不同的信賴水準所得出之檢定量，以改進Kupiec（1995）單變量涵蓋機率檢定的不足。 本文採用臺灣加權股價指數、臺灣十年期公債指標殖利率之百元報價、美元外匯與臺指選擇權作為實證資料，運用變異數－共變異數法、歷史模擬法與蒙地卡羅模擬法來衡量資產組合的風險值，並以涵蓋機率檢定評估各風險值模型的準確性。變異數－共變異數法包括RiskMetrics法、GARCH法、GARCH－T法以及AR（1）-GARCH（1, 1）法。 本篇的實證研究所得到的主要結論是，多變量涵蓋機率檢定可以偵測到因為單變量涵蓋機率檢定無法全面考慮而導致的誤判，從而降低錯誤的風險值估計模型被接受的可能性。除此之外，實證結果也顯示變異數－共變異數法與歷史模擬法表現最佳，此結果與Pérignon and Smith的研究結論相符合。
並列摘要
This study adopts a new backtesting method of Pérignon and Smith (2008), which uses multivariate coverage test as the framework to evaluate the accuracy of VaR models. The multivariate coverage test is a multivariate generalization of Kupiec’s (1995) unconditional coverage test. Its basic idea is that instead of considering only a single coverage probability, the accuracy of a given VaR method should be assessed with different coverage probabilities within the same period. Weekly data of Taiwan Weighted Stock Index, 10-Year Government Bond, Currency Exchage Rates in US Dollars, and Taiwan Weighted Stock Index Options are used in this study. The results indicate that multivariate test improves the ability of univariate test to reject misspecified VaR models. Empirically, historical simulation method and parametric methods worked better for portfolio trading revenues. The results are consistent with that of Pérignon and Smith.
參考文獻
1. Alexander, C. O., and C. T. Leigh, 1997, "On The Covariance Matrices Used in Value-at-Risk Models," Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 50-62.
2. Barraquand, J. and D. Martineau, 1995, "Numerical Valuation of High Dimensional Multivariate American Securities," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 383-405.
3. Beder, T. S., 1995, "VaR: Seductive but Dangerous," Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 12-24.
4. Berkowitz, J., 2001, "Testing Density Forecasts, with Applications to Risk Management," Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 465-474.
5. Bollerslev, T., 1986, "Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 307-327.
延伸閱讀
- Chen, Y. J. (2020). 風險平價策略與風險因子分析 [master's thesis, National Chiao Tung University]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0030-1504202111221371
- 楊建宏（2012）。不同風險衡量指標的投資組合再調整模型之比較〔碩士論文，國立暨南國際大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0020-2208201213041400
- 許晉雄、鄒慶士、葉柏緯（2009）。均值－風險投資組合模式之分析與比較：常態與非常態資料。文大商管學報，14(2)，71-98。https://doi.org/10.30163/BR.200912.0004
- Agboluaje, A. A., Ismail, S. B., & Yip, C. Y. (2016). Comparing Vector Autoregressive (VAR) Estimation with Combine White Noise (CWN) Estimation. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 12(5), 544-549. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.12.2682
- 林秀娟、陳順宇（2015）。The Comparison of Estimated Moderating Effect with Latent Variables。人力資源管理學報，15(3)，53-74。https://doi.org/10.6147/JHRM.2015.1503.03