買賣單不平衡理論與股價報酬關係-以台灣五十成分股為例

Order Imbalance Theory and Stock Returns-Evidence From TSEC Taiwan 50 Index

洪嘉宏(Chia-Hung Hung)

指導教授 ： 陳思寬

國立臺灣大學/管理學院/國際企業學研究所/碩士(2008年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.10211

摘要

本研究旨在驗證[Chordia, T. & Subrahmanyam, A（2004）. Order imbalance and individual stock returns: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 72, 485-518]所提出的買賣單不平衡與股價報酬關係是否也存在於台灣證券市場上。選用最接近國外交易制度的台灣50成分股（民國94年5月16日至民國97年3月7日）進行分析後得出以下幾點：

1 .買賣單不平衡存在正的自我相關；這點與Chordia and Subrahmanyam（2004）在紐約證交所（New York Stock Exchange, NYSE）所做的結果類似

2 .當期股價報酬與當期買賣單不平衡和落後期買賣單不平衡確實存有線性關係。且當期買賣單不平衡係數是正、落後期買賣單不平衡係數是負。

3 .以落後期的買賣單不平衡對於股價報酬做預測時發現，在台灣買賣單不平衡訊號對並沒有具備預測股價報酬的能力。可能的因素有：1.市場結構的差異；2.投資人結構的差異。

關鍵字

買賣單不平衡 ； 股價報酬 ； 市場微結構

並列摘要

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the evidence of the linkage between daily order imbalance and daily returns of individual stock in the Taiwan stock market and examine “Order Imbalance Theory” which is reported by Chordia and Subrahmanyam [Chordia, T. & Subrahmanyam, A（2004）. Order imbalance and individual stock ruturns: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 72, 485-518] by TSEC Taiwan 50 Index（from 2005/5/16 to 2008/4/7）. The result is:

1. In equilibrium, the discretionary liquidity trader splits his order across the two periods, so that equilibrium order imbalances are positively autocorrelated. It is similar to that of the New York Stock Exchange as reported by Chordia and Subrahmanyam (2004).

2. The expectation of the price change P2 - P1 conditional on the contemporaneous and lagged order imbalances; respectively, is linear in these variables. The coefficient of contemporaneous order imbalance is positive while that of lagged order imbalances is negative.

3. However, there is no evidence that lagged order imbalances predict subsequent returns. The difference in predicative power could be attributed to differences in trading mechanisms on the two exchanges and to differences in the turnover rates.

並列關鍵字

Order imbalance ； stock return ； market microstructure

參考文獻

黃玉娟, 林明白, 2003,買賣單不平衡、價差和報酬之探討：以台指期貨在台灣期貨交易所及新加坡交易所為例,財務金融學刊,11(2), 71-98。

Benston, G.J. and R.L. Hagerman., 1974, Determinants of bid-ask spreads in the over-the-counter market, Journal of Financial Economics, 1, 353-364.

Chordia, T. & Subrahmanyam, A., 2004, Order imbalance and individual stock ruturns: Theory and evidence. Journal of financial Economics, 72, 485-518

Cushing, D., Madhavan, A., 2000, Stock returns and trading at the close. Journal of Financial Markets, 3, 45-67.

Ellis, K., R. Michaely, and M. O’Hara, 2000, The accuracy of trade classification rules: evidence from Nasdaq, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35, 529-551.