透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.188.168.28
  • 學位論文

以市場參與者行為模型假說解釋動能效果週轉率效果及動能生命週期現象

指導教授 : 湛可南
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


我們首先放寬投資理論中有關市場參與者只有理性投資人之基本假設,並將市場參與者區分為內部人士(內線交易者)、技術操作者(動能交易者)、理性投資人及非理性投資人等四類,接著藉由這四類投資人的互動行為提出我們的市場參與者行為模型假說,然後以此模型重新解釋市場中的動能、週轉率及動能生命週期等現象。 在實證的部分,我們驗證兩個從模型中推理出的論點,推論一是台股會有無(或弱)動能效果、強週轉率效果現象,推論二是非理性投資人的存在是導致價格過度反應的原因,為了驗證以上兩個論點我們以套利交易模型的方式分別驗證台股有無動能效果、週轉率效果及融資使用率效果現象,最後結果顯示台股無動能效果,但有很強的週轉率效果及融資使用率效果現象,因此實證結果支持我們的推論。

關鍵字

交易策略 動能 週轉率

並列摘要


In this article, we change the basic assumption that there are only rational investors in stock market. We divide the types of investors into four groups: inside traders, rational investors, technical traders, and irrational investors. The interactions among these four types of investors constitute our behaviors of market participators model. Then, we use the behaviors of market participators model to redefine and explain momentum effects, turnover effects, and momentum life cycle phenomena. In the part of empirical study, we examine two inferences derived from our behaviors of market participators model. The first inference is that there would be weak momentum effects but strong turnover effects in Taiwan stock market. The second one is that the existence of irrational investors causes overreaction to stock price. To test the above two inferences, we use momentum, turnover, and margin-trading trading strategies respectively. The final empirical results show that there are weak momentum effects, but strong turnover and margin-trading effects in Taiwan stock market. Thus, the empirical results are consistent with the inferences derived from our model.

並列關鍵字

turnover trading strategy momentum

參考文獻


1. 洪榮華、雷雅淇,2002,公司規模、股價、益本比、淨值市價比與股票報酬關係之實証研究,管理評論,第21卷,第3期,25-48。
3. 胡星陽,1998,流動性對台灣股票報酬率的影響,財務金融學刊,第5卷,第4期,1-19。
4. 方智強、姚明慶,1998,台灣上市公司的淨值市價比現象,管理學報,第15卷,第3期,367-391。
1. Amihud, Yakov, and Haim Mendelson, 1986, Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread, Journal of Financial Economics 17, 223-249.
2. Banz, Rolf W. 1981 “ The relationship between return and market value of common stocks” Journal of Financial Economics vol.9 p.3~18.

延伸閱讀