透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.139.104
  • 學位論文

男性親密關係暴力受刑人之衝動性攻擊相關因素探討與再犯風險評估

Correlates of Impulsive Aggression and Recidivism Evaluation for Male Intimate Partner Violence Inmates

指導教授 : 張素凰
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


親密關係暴力的發生,不僅破壞伴侶間的情感與信任,也會對家庭的和諧造成損害,而目睹婚暴除危害兒少的身心健康,甚至可能造成暴力的代間傳遞,成為目睹兒少成年後施加親密關係暴力的危險因子,其影響可能既深且遠。然而,國內目前較缺乏探究親密關係暴力行為的心理病理研究,在處遇與預防上可能因欠缺實證研究支持有所限制。因此,本研究目的有三:1)校正社會期許反應偏向對攻擊自陳報告之影響,並驗證男性親密關係暴力受刑人是否可分類為以衝動性攻擊為主及以計畫性攻擊為主二類型;2)提出影響男性親密關係暴力受刑人做出衝動性攻擊犯行之假設模型並加以驗證;3)探討影響男性親密關係暴力再犯之危險因素,並檢驗影響研究目的二之衝動性攻擊犯行之危險因素是否對於親密關係暴行再犯同樣具有預測力。本研究採立意取樣,共邀請186位男性親密關係暴力受刑人參與本研究。資料收集之方法包括:半結構式訪談、回顧犯罪史、及自陳報告。研究結果發現,在控制社會期許反應偏向對攻擊自陳報告之影響後,親密關係暴力加害人可區分為以衝動性攻擊為主及以計劃性攻擊為主之兩大類型,而男性親密關係受刑人,以衝動性攻擊為主者佔多數(九成)。關於研究目的二,結果顯示,當男性親密關係暴力受刑人的負向控制感越高、飲酒問題程度愈高時,其做出衝動性攻擊的可能性就愈高。關於研究目的三,結果顯示,在預測男性受刑人再犯親密關係暴力之衝動性攻擊犯行可能性方面,當同時考慮其指標犯行時之家暴罪種類(違反保護令罪)、過去接受社區處遇概況(未完成處遇者)、累再犯同罪(曾因親密關係暴力犯行而入監)等變項,則大約可以得到接近八成(77.4%)的預測準確率。因此,依據本研究之發現,建議未來在進行家暴處遇時,可以從如何降低男性親密關係暴力受刑人的負向控制感、以及飲酒行為問題等面向切入,擬定對應的治療策略。另,本研究發現親密關係暴力受刑人之社會期許傾向明顯較高,因此,需特別重視信賴治療關係的建立,而治療期程與結案時機,則需視信賴關係建立之程度與治療成效而彈性調整。

並列摘要


Intimate partner violence (IPV) not only destroys intimacy and trust in the relationship, but also harms the harmony of the family. Children’s witnessing of intimate partner violence has adverse effect on their mental health, and may contribute as a risk factor to the intergenerational transmission of violence and future intimate partner violence. The purpose of the present research was three-fold: 1) After adjusting for social desirability response bias, tested the possible subtypes of male offenders of intimate partner violence (IPV), namely, predominantly impulsive aggression and predominantly premeditated aggression; 2) tested our proposed impulsive aggression offending process model among male inmates of IPV; and 3) examined whether the risk factors associated with impulsive aggressive offending were also predictive of recidivism among male inmates of IPV. Using purposive sampling, 186 male inmates of IPV were recruited. Data collection methods included semi-structured interview, criminal history review, and self-reports. The results showed that the construct validity of the Impulsive/Premeditated Aggression Scales (IPAS) was confirmed. The aggression of most inmates in the present sample was characterized as predominately impulsive in nature (90%). As to the research purpose 2, it showed that the more severe IPV inmates’ alcohol consumption problems, the higher the likelihood of impulsive aggression. Besides, levels of negative sense of control also had positive effects on impulsive aggression. Finally, regarding the research purpose 3, it revealed that when violation of protection order for the index offense, drop-out from community treatment and 5-year recidivism of intimate partner violence were taken into account, the predictive ability of recidivism of the impulsive aggression subtype of IPV reached almost eighty percent (77.4%) accuracy. Hence, according to the findings of this research, we recommend that in future interventions for domestic violence, treatment approaches could be developed based on reducing IPV inmates’ negative sense of control and alcohol consumption problems. Further, this research revealed high social desirability in inmates of IPV, indicating the need to establish a trusting therapeutic relationship. The duration and termination of treatment also need to be adjusted according to the degree of rapport and trustworthiness established as well as the effectiveness of the treatment.

參考文獻


翁嘉英、林宜美、呂碧鴻、陳秀蓉、吳英璋、鄭逸如(2008):〈「短式華人敵意量表」之發展與信效度考驗〉。《測驗學刊》,55,463-487。
陳俊興、黃名琪、沈武典(2006):〈某綜合醫院問題性飲酒者之改變動機調查〉。《臺灣精神醫學》,20,201-211。
陳筱萍、周煌智、吳慈恩、黃志中(2004):〈裁定前鑑定家庭暴力相對人特徵與施暴的心理社會歸因〉。《中華輔導學報》,(16),149-181。
劉美蓉、張素凰(2011):〈自殘青少年併有與不併有邊緣人格特質者在經驗迴避、生死態度及控制感的差異〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》,24,429-455。
呂孟真(2007):《自我傷害動機、負向情緒、經驗迴避、情緒調節與青少年自我傷害行為之關係探索》(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學心理學研究所,臺北市。

延伸閱讀