透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.17.174.239
  • 學位論文

廣告圖片的多重角色:廣告圖片與產品相關性,廣告圖片吸引力,訊息品質及消費者涉入程度對產品態度之影響

The multiple roles of pictures in advertisements: The influences of picture relevance, picture attractiveness, argument quality and involvement on consumers' attitudes

指導教授 : 簡怡雯

摘要


圖片在消費者的訊息處理及說服過程當中扮演非常重要的角色。根據過去的理論研究發現,圖片的確對消費者的態度有顯著的影響。這篇研究主要的目的是探討與圖片相關的屬性,如:圖片與產品的相關性及圖片的吸引力加上訊息品質與消費者涉入程度之後,對消費者態度之影響。1本研究的目標著重在一般平面媒體的廣告,如:雜誌上的平面廣告,並且引用說服變數的多重角色這篇理論來驗證圖片吸引力和訊息品質在不同相關性的圖片與涉入程度之下,如何影響受測者在觀看平面廣告之後的產品態度。 根據說服變數的多重角色這篇理論及本研究,在高涉入的情況下,當受測者觀看的平面廣告含有與產品相關且具吸引力的圖片時,圖片吸引力會對受測者的態度產生顯著的影響。當受測者觀看的平面廣告含有與產品不相關且不具吸引力的圖片時,圖片吸引力對受測者的態度就不會產生任何的影響。最後在低涉入的情況下,圖片吸引力會依照週邊線索的方式對受測者的產品態度產生影響。

並列摘要


Pictures often play a major role in persuasive messages. We know that a pictorial stimulus makes considerable sense given the variety of ways in which they can facilitate persuasion. This study examines how involvement and picture-product relevance moderate the consumers’ processing. Besides, the study also concerns how picture attractiveness and argument quality have its impact on consumers’ product attitudes when the two moderators are functioning. It is based on previous results of researches in the field of consumers’ processing and we apply the concept of dual-process theories especially the perspective of multiple roles of persuasion variables to explain our study findings. The results show that in the high-involvement and product-relevant picture condition, participants who are exposed to an attractive picture ad will generate more favorable product attitudes than those who are exposed to an unattractive picture. Comparatively in the high-involvement and product-irrelevant picture condition, no matter whether the picture is attractive or not, the picture doesn’t have any impact on attitudes toward the product. Finally this study also confirms some prior studies concluding that in the low-involvement condition, variables can have its impact on consumers’ product attitudes via peripheral route.

參考文獻


Brinol, Pablo, Richard E. Petty, & Zakary L. Tormala (2004), “Self-validation of cognitive responses to advertisements,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 559-572.
Chaiken, S. (1980), “Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
Chaiken, S. & Durairaj Maheswaran (1994), “Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473.
Edell, Julie A. & Richard Staelin (1983), “The information processing of pictures in print advertisements,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 45-61.
Lord, Kenneth R, Myung-Soo Lee, & Paul L. Sauer (1995), “The combined influence hypothesis: central and peripheral antecedents of attitude toward the ad,” Journal of Advrtising, XXIV, 73-85.

被引用紀錄


簡佩宣(2006)。善因行銷效果之研究—贊助金額、廣告主題與產品種類之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2006.00508

延伸閱讀