透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.149.250.1
  • 學位論文

過度自信經理人如何影響公司的股利政策?

Do Overconfident CEOs Influence Dividend Payout Policy ?

指導教授 : 何耕宇
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本論文指出「經理人過度自信」可以用來解釋公司股利政策。由於過度自信的經理人過度投資,因此他們宣告股利的相對次數較少且股利發放金額較低。股利減少的情況隨著公司未來成長機會及投資增加而更加嚴重;隨著公司內部資金變多及公司規模變大而減輕。非過度自信經理人宣告股利增加,短期股票市場對於此事件的反應顯著為正,然而過度自信經理人與非過度自信經理人宣告股利增加的短期股票市場反應並沒有顯著差異。非過度自信經理人宣告股利增加,長期股票市場對於此事件的反應顯著為正。除此之外,過度自信經理人宣告股利增加的長期股票市場報酬顯著低於非過度自信經理人。

並列摘要


We argue that overconfidence of CEO helps to explain dividend decisions. Since overconfident CEOs are prone to overinvest, they would like to declare dividend less frequently and pay smaller amount of dividends as well. The reduction in dividends of overconfident CEO is larger if firms with higher growth opportunity, but smaller if firms with higher cash flow and larger firm size. The short-run stock market reactions, cumulative abnormal returns (CAR), to dividend-increase declarations are significantly positive for non-overconfident CEOs, but not significantly positive for overconfident CEOs. However, there is no significant difference for the two groups of CEOs in the short-run. The magnitude of long-run positive reactions, buy-and-hold abnormal returns (BHAR), to dividend-increase events are also significant for non-overconfident CEOs. Specifically, the BHAR of overconfident CEOs are significantly lower than non-overconfident CEOs in the long run. Overall, overconfidence of CEOs can explain the dividend policies.

參考文獻


Agrawal, A., Ja e, J., and Mandelker, G. (1992). The post-merger performance of acquiring rms: A re-examination of an anomaly. Journal of Finance,47(4):1605--1621.
Allen, F. and Michaely, R. (2003). Payout Policy. Handbook of the Economics of Finance. Elsevier/North-Holland. Edited by Constantinides, G.M. and Harris,M. and Stulz, R.M.
Barber, B. and Lyon, J. (1996). Detecting abnormal operating performance:The empirical power and speci cation of test statistics. Journal of FinancialEconomics, 41(3):359--399.
Barber, B. and Lyon, J. (1997). Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns:The empirical power and speci cation of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(3):341--372.
Bhattacharya, S. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and `` the bird in the hand ' fallacy. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1):259--270.

被引用紀錄


陳柏慈(2011)。高登股利成長模式適用於台灣證劵市場之探討〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2011.00145

延伸閱讀