巨災交換契約之定價模型

Pricing of Catastrophe Swap

羅伊芃(I-Peng Lo)

指導教授 ： 曾郁仁

共同指導教授 ： 黃瑞卿(Rachel Juiching Huang)

國立臺灣大學/管理學院/財務金融學研究所/碩士(2009年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.02524

摘要

近幾年，天然災害造成的影響不論是在發生頻率或是損害程度上，都存在著顯著性的增加，伴隨著人口密度的增加與資產的集中化，巨幅的經濟損失遂成為了天然災害易發生區域的最重要課題。縱然市場上已經發展出各式各樣處理巨災風險的新金融商品，卻因為前述原因以及巨災風險再保險市場的萎縮，使得我們不得不另覓他法來對抗這個無法避免的趨勢。
本篇論文將設計一個跨期性理賠的避險模型來處理巨災風險，於後文將會仔細地介紹這個全新的避險策略「巨災交換契約」其模型的建構概念以及方式，並由蒙地卡羅模擬法計算出所需的交換數額，最後，針對三種不同的巨災風險處理來進行數值分析，藉由比較其「淨現金流量」和「期望效用」來驗證該巨災交換契約模型的可行性與有利性。

關鍵字

巨災風險 ； 巨災交換契約 ； 巨災保險

並列摘要

There is a growing evidence that the coming years will see a rise in both the frequency and severity of natural disasters. The increased frequency of natural disasters coincides with the increasing concentration of population and assets in disaster prone areas which leads to growing economic losses. Though various kinds of financing instruments have been developed against catastrophe risks, because of the previous reasons plus the shrink of reinsurance market in the world, we still can not help but find out new methods to fight against this unavoidable trend.
This study develops a whole new aspect of contingent-claim model for hedging the catastrophe risk. We describe the framework of the new hedging strategy - catastrophe swap - as detail as possible and compute the exchange amount of CAT swap contract by Monte Carlo Simulation. Last but not least, this article reveals the most powerful back-up, net cash flow and utility comparison between different strategies, to prove the practicability and favorableness of our catastrophe swap model.

並列關鍵字

Catastrophe risk ； Catastrophe swap contract ； Catastrophe insurance

參考文獻

1. Jin-Ping Lee, Min-Teh Yu, “Valuation of catastrophe reinsurance with catastrophe bonds”, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 41 (2007) 264-278.

2. Jin-Ping Lee, Min-Teh Yu, “Pricing Default-Risky CAT Bonds With Moral Hazard And Basis Risk”, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2002, Vol. 69, No. 1, 25-44.

3. Dwight M. Jaffee, Thomas Russell, “Catastrophe Insurance, Capital Markets, and Uninsurable Risks”, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1997, Vol. 64, No.2, 205-230.

4. Scott E. Harrington, “Insurance Derivatives, Tax Policy, and the Future of the Insurance Industry”, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1997, Vol. 64, No.4, 719-725.

5. Scott Harrington, Greg Niehaus, “Basis Risk with PCS Catastrophe Insurance Derivatives Contracts”, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1999, Vol. 66, No. 1, 49-82.