透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.121.160
  • 學位論文

選擇權評價法與信用評分法財務危機預測力研究

An Analysis of Option Pricing Model Prediction Power: Comparison with Z Score

指導教授 : 陳業寧 胡星陽
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本篇論文主要比較選擇權評價法(Option pricing model)與信用評分法(Z-score)對財務危機的預測力。研究資料根據1990 年至2002 年美國公開發行上市公司。為了檢視對網路泡沫財務危機的預測力,觀察值樣本分成不同時點與不同類型分別檢驗。從檢定力曲線(Power curve),發現選擇權評價法(Option pricing model)預測力在網路泡沫前與網路泡沫後均顯著優於信用評分法(Z-score)。群內分析法(Intra-cohort analysis)則無明顯差異。

並列摘要


This paper examines the prediction power between Z-score (Z) and Option pricing model (Distance to Default, DD) over 1990 to 2002 by US listed company data. In order to figure out the internet bubble effect, the firm-year observation values are divided by different time period and two types of companies. In intra-cohort analysis, we can not find strong evidence to support which model is better. In power curve analysis, we discover that Option Pricing Model performs better than Z-score for all firms in the whole period, before and after the internet-bubble. For internet-related, electronic and telecommunication firms,Option Pricing Model still dominates in any period.

並列關鍵字

Power curve Prediction power

參考文獻


陳業寧、王衍智、許鴻英 (2004) 「企業財務危機之預測:信用評分法與選擇權評價法孰佳?」, working paper
Altman, E. I., 1968, Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy, Journal of Finance, 23, 4, 589-609.
Black, F. and M. Scholes, 1973, The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-659.
Crouhy, M., D. Galai and R. Mark, 2000, A comparative analysis of current credit risk models, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 59-117.
Hull,J., I. Nelken and A.White, 2003, Merton’s model, credit risk, and volatility Skews , working paper

被引用紀錄


李彥錚(2006)。影響選擇權模型衡量信用風險有效性的公司特性探討〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2006.03055

延伸閱讀