我國未成年子女扶養費請求之研究

A Study of Claims for Child Support in Taiwan

黃育玲(Yu-Ling Huang)

指導教授 ： 陳顯武

國立臺灣大學/社會科學院/國家發展研究所/碩士(2007年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.02578

摘要

有關未成年子女扶養之紛爭往往多見於渠等父母之婚姻關係即將崩解或已崩解或自始無婚姻關係，因而影響未成年子女之保護教養，本文即側重父母間對未成年子女保護教養費用之分擔及未成年子女對父母請求扶養，於實體法及程序法上之相關問題予以探討。以下具體說明各章內容。
第一章緒論，從未成年子女（或兒童）保護於兒童權利公約之彰顯及憲法上之依據出發，論及未成年子女扶養於現實生活中之處境及於司法救濟中所面臨之困境。
第二章未成年子女扶養制度之形成與規範，本章在關於未成年子女扶養制度之形成部分，將介紹公的扶助與私的扶養及扶養權義之特質。而於未成年子女規範部份，先探討私的扶養與親權之關係，並論及親權是否包含扶養之爭論，以釐清親權與扶養分離說；另論者針對未成年子女扶養費、未成年子女保護教養費、家庭生活費之區分有不同見解，此亦有說明之必要。繼而先以立法論方式，探討現行法規範目前明文規範之內容；次以解釋論方式，探討我國受日本學說影響，引進法未明文之生活保持義務與生活扶助義務之區分，此扶養義務二分法在我國學說運用之狀況；再以實踐論方式，探討扶養義務二分法在我國實務上運作之現況。
第三章以實體法面向探討未成年子女扶養費之請求，探討未成年子女扶養費之請求權基礎。
第四章以程序法面向探討未成年子女扶養費之請求，從程序上當事人適格出發，並論及審理程序之統合處理及扶養裁判之效力。
第五章現行法之檢討，針對法規範及實務運作予以檢討。
第六章結論，綜合前述各章之討論，試圖提出修法建議及方向，希冀對維護未成年子女之最佳利益有所助益。

關鍵字

親權 ； 扶養義務 ； 生活保持義務 ； 子女扶養費 ； 子女之最佳利益

並列摘要

Most disputes about claims for child support generally occur at the time that the marriage relationship of parents would be dissolving or had collapsed or even never exist at all , hence influence the condition of parents bringing up and educating their children. This article mainly stress on the related issues in the substantive law and the procedural law about the responsibility of sharing for the necessary expense of children’s living and education, and the minors claim for child support from the parents. Here below are the essentials of each chapter’s context.

First chapter is introduction. Under the Convention on the Rights of Children and the ROC（Taiwan） Constitution, concerns the real situation of maintaining infancy children and the difficulty the minors have to confront during they claim for child support through legal procedure.

The second chapter will discuss the formation and the legislation of the child support system .In the part of the formation about the child support system, this chapter will introduce the assisting from public and the support for privation. Additionally, this chapter will introduce the characteristics of the right and the obligation about the support for privation. In the part of the legislation with regard to the child support , this section will examine the relations between parental rights and the child support early, then touch upon the argumentation about the parental rights whether contains the child support to define the statement that parental rights separates with the child support . Furthermore, there are different opinions concerning the child support claimed by the part of the parents, the child support requested by the minorities and the family living expenses, so it is necessary to expound.
Subsequently, this section will early investigate the content of the legislation currently in effect about the child support in the mode of legislature. Due to the influence of Japanese theory, domestic law profession recommend the distinction between living support obligation and living assistance obligation. Therefore next examine the application of domestic doctrine about the dichotomy of these obligations in the way of interpretation theory. Last ascertain the operation in the court in the way of Practice.

The third chapter discuss the claims for child support in the aspect of substantive law, afterward investigate the foundation about the rights to claim for child support.

The fourth chapter examine the claims for child support in the phase of procedural law. This section lead off with the legal capacity to be the litigant in the procedure, then concerns the integrated processing of the procedure for trial and the validity of the judgment for child support.

The fifth chapter is the criticism of the legislation currently in effect. Offer review on the statute regarding the child support and analyze the opinion.

The sixth chapter is the conclusion.
Synthesizing the states above-mentioned in each chapter, this segment attempt to propose the direction about a change in the law.
And hoped this could help to maintain the best interest of the child.

並列關鍵字

parental rights ； maintenance obligation ； living support obligation ； child support ； the best interest of the child

參考文獻

林秀雄，〈論夫妻之扶養—最高法院七九年台上字第二六二九號判例評釋〉，收錄於《黃宗樂教授六秩祝賀—家族法學篇 》，台北：學林文化，民91年。

洪遠亮，〈兒童及少年福利法的幾個法律問題〉，《律師雜誌》287期，台北：台北律師公會，民92年。

施慧玲，〈論我國民法親屬編之修正方向與力法原則〉，《家庭、法律、福利國家-現代親屬身分法論文集》，台北：元照出版，民90年。

吳秀菊，〈家庭生活費用與子女扶養費用〉，「子女扶養費事件研討會」，婦女新知基金會、晚晴協會，民91年。

沈冠伶，〈家事非訟事件之程序保障—基於紛爭類型審理論及程序法理交錯式用論之觀點〉，《臺大法學論叢》第35卷4期，台北：台灣大學法律系，民國95年。