從服務主導邏輯觀點探討共創價值-以運動鞋品牌商、製鞋廠和鞋材廠的合作開發案為例

Exploring the Value Co-creation with Service-dominant Perspective:The Case of sports shoe brand, shoe manufacture and shoe material producer

劉松原(Sung-Yuan Liu)

指導教授 ： 謝明慧

國立臺灣大學/管理學院/國際企業管理組/碩士(2015年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.02669

摘要

在目前的經濟背景之下，傳統的商品質主導邏輯已經無法詮釋現代商業環境的變化或指導企業的策略制訂。企業必須在全新的服務主導邏輯的指引下與其顧客或伙伴進行價值共創，才能獲得持續的競爭優勢。

所以，本研究透過質性研討的個案研究法，深入探究運動鞋品牌商、製鞋廠和鞋材廠共同開發的功能性鞋材Duroflex H-1500和 G-1205的過程。從服務主導邏輯的觀點分析這三方在共同研發過程中的互動，探討出共創價值的成功要素。

本研究的結果顯示，各企業投入(或掌握)的資源、相關訊息透明度和利潤分享的公平性是影響此共創模式成敗的最關鍵因素。

關鍵字

服務主導邏輯 ； 共創價值 ； 功能性鞋材 ； 共同研發 ； 利潤分享

並列摘要

Under the contemporary economic environment, traditional good-dominate logic is no longer able to explain the change of business style or guide the strategy for corporate. Therefore, in order to be competitive in the future, corporates have to shift to the new service-dominate logic which will lead to value co-creation.

This study deeply explores the operation of co-creation among sports shoe brand, shoe manufacture and shoe material producer on two novelle shoe material, Duroflex H-1500 and G-1205, by using qualitative case study. Through analyzing the interaction among these three parties by the theory of service-dominant logic to clarify the factors which affecting the outcome of co-creation and the satisfaction of individual to the collaborative relation.

The result of this study indicates that the resources held, information clarity and equality of benefit-sharing is the key factors, lead to the success of co-creation.

並列關鍵字

service- dominate logic ； value co-creation ； shoe material ； co-innovation ； benefit-sharing

參考文獻

7.鄭陸霖 (1999)，一個半邊陲的浮現與隱藏:國際鞋類市場網絡重組下的生產外移，台灣社會研究季刊第 35 期,pp.1-46。

12.台灣區製鞋工業同業公會(1989)，台灣製鞋三十年史。

1.Stephen L. Vargo˙Robert F. Lusch. Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution; Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (2008) 36:1-10;DOI 10.1007/ s11747-007-0069-6.

2.Elizabethe B.-N. Sanders & Pieter Jan Stappers. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design: co-design; March 2008,Vol 4, No.1, 5-18

4.Andersen, P. H., & Kragh, H. (2010). Sense and sensibility: Two approaches for using existing theory in theory-building qualitative research. Industrial Marketing Management,39(1), 49–55.