兩岸政治議題協商監督機制立法之研究

自太陽花學運後，我國人民開始正視監督兩岸簽屬各項協議的重要性，各界隨後提出各自版本的監督機制草案。2019年兩岸政治議題再度升溫，尤以兩岸協商最需要重視，當年未三讀通過的監督機制以增訂兩岸人民條例之姿再度進入立法院。本文在此背景下，比較本次新修法各界提出的版本異同之處。本文首先從我國條約締結法相關法理背景討論，因應兩岸特殊關係，參酌法理上防衛性民主的憲法原則。本文比較各界提供本次修法的各個版本，包括行政院版本、經濟民主連合版本、時代力量黨版本、國民黨版本以及蘇巧慧版本。各版本大致將兩岸政治協商之監督分為三個階段：事前監督、事中監督、事後監督，分別由立法院以及公民投票把關。最後，本文綜合各版本未竟之業，提出筆者之立法建議。

關鍵字

臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例；兩岸政治協商；權力分立；監督機制；條約締結

並列摘要

After the protest, Sunflower Movement, Taiwanese began to focus on the importance of Cross-Strait Agreement Supervisory Mechanism. Including government and folk groups proposed some versions. In 2019, problems between Cross-Strait showed up again, especially Cross-Strait Agreement. The supervisory mechanism once tried to legislate in legislative yuan, now being discussed again. This study compared 6 new drafts based on this background. First, the study began with the legal principle of Conclusion of Treaties Act. Because of the special relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, the study also discussed the legal principle, Defensive democracy, of Constitution. The study compared 6 versions at the legislation, including Executive Yuen, Economic Democracy Union , New Power Party, KMT, and Su Chiao-Hui. Hey. Roughly speaking, they divided the supervisory mechanism into three stages, which is before-negotiation, between-negotiation, and after-negotiation, the three stages are responsible to Legislative Yuan and the referendum. Finally, the study proposed a version, which combined the 6 versions’ pros, and tried to avoid the cons.