廣告圖片的多重角色：圖片與產品屬性之相關性，論點之具體程度與涉入程度對勸服之影響

The Multiple Roles of Pictures in Advertisements: the Influence of Relevance of Pictures to Product Attrubute, Concreteness of Arguments and Involvement in Persuasion

王思閎(Szu-Hung Wang)

指導教授 ： 簡怡雯

國立臺灣大學/管理學院/商學研究所/碩士(2005年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.02993

摘要

無資料

關鍵字

多重角色 ； 圖片 ； 勸服

並列摘要

In our daily life, persuasive messages exert a strong influence on people’s consumption behavior. Within persuasive messages, pictures often play an important role. However, a common advertisement usually consists of visual and verbal elements. The degree of informational overlap between the ad’s pictorial and argument elements may result in different effect of pictures. At one extreme, pictures can be totally superfluous when arguments are concrete and communicate the same information with pictures. At the other end of this continuum, pictures can convey product information which is not provided by the arguments at all. This study examines how the picture influences the persuasion process moderated by involvement and argument concreteness.
The results show that when involvement is high, pictures conveying highly attribute-relevant information do evoke more favorable attitude toward product’s attribute and toward overall product than pictures conveying low attribute-relevant information. Further more, when elaboration likelihood is high, low attribute-relevant pictures don’t have effect on persuasion whereas highly attribute-relevant pictures will have greater impact on persuasion with abstract than concrete arguments. Nevertheless, when elaboration likelihood is low, pictures will induce favorable attitudes toward the product as long as the picture is rated positively. The concreteness of argument and the relevance of a picture to the product do not matter.

並列關鍵字

Multiple Roles ； Picture ； Persuasion

參考文獻

Cialdini, Robert B., Richard E. Petty, and John T. Cacioppo (1981), “Attitude and Attitude Change,” Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 357-404.

Chaiken, Shelly (1980), “Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and The Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.

——— and Durairaj Maheswaran (1994), “Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473.

Finn, Adam (1988), “Print Ad Recognition Readership Scores: An Information Processing Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 168-177.

Herr, Paul M., Frank R. Kardes, and John Kim (1991), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility- Diagnosticity Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 454-462.