透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.100
  • 學位論文

從國家利益觀點探討美、中、台戰略互動關係之研究 -以2008年「入聯公投」事件為例

Discussing the strategic interaction of U.S., China and Taiwan from the perspective of national interest. - Take the Referendum of Joining the United Nation in 2008 for example

指導教授 : 施正權

摘要


「入聯」,是2000年政黨輪替之前,國民黨政府執政時期所默默推動的外交政策;因為力道遲緩、能見度低,故成效有限。然而,當陳水扁總統將「入聯」與「公投」相結合時,卻對美、中、台三方造成若干衝擊。 在兩岸的政治格局中,長久以來始終存在著美國勢力的介入;而分析三方的互動過程,各國皆以追求其國家最大利益作為政策產出的準據。因為,「國家利益」被視為是國家生存與國家安全最重要的核心。 儘管,台灣方面所提出的「入聯公投」,已隨著2008年總統選舉的結束,而煙消雲散。然本文試圖藉由台灣所提出的「入聯公投」事件,觀察美、中、台三方所引發的一連串互動,歸納其對於「國家利益」的基本界定與策略調整。希冀利用理論推演與實務觀察的方式,找出美、中、台三方戰略互動的模式與規則,以提供我政府在政策擬定之依據。

並列摘要


“Returning to UN” was the diplomatic policy of KMT before 2000. KMT was conservative, and it was not surprising that there was very limited progress in the promotion of this policy. However, ex president Chen Shui-Bian combined “returning to UN” with “referendum” and resulted in very shocking impact to the United States, China, and Taiwan. The United States of America has always played an important role in the interaction between China and Taiwan, and the main concern of the three countries is their individual national benefit, which is the core of survival and security. Though “Referendum of Joining the United Nation” raised by Taiwan vanished with the ending of presidential election in 2008, this study still tries to discuss the series of interactions between the United States, China, and Taiwan after the referendum, and tries to conclude the definition of “national benefit” and the adjustment of relevant policies. Moreover, with observation and theoretical analysis, models and principles related to how the three nations interact are proposed, which could be reference data for the government of Taiwan in making relevant policies.

參考文獻


6. 林正義。<公投入聯與台美關係>。《戰略安全研析》,2007年10月,第30期,頁7。
14. 莫大華。<千禧年後的台海安全-批判性安全觀的看法>。《遠景季刊》,2000年,第2卷第1期,頁35-65。
18. 魏鏞。<邁向民族內共同體:台海兩岸互動模式之建構、發展與檢驗>。《中國大陸研究》,2002年,第四十五卷第五期,頁1-55。
11. Nye, Joseph S. Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History. New York: Longman, 2003.
3. Heritage Foundation(傳統基金會)

延伸閱讀