臺北都市再生策略之案例研究：從社會基礎設施的視角

The Case Study of Taipei Urban Regeneration Strategy: from the Perspective of Social Infrastructure

黃文亨(Wen-Heng Huang)

指導教授 ： 黃瑞茂

淡江大學/工學院/建築學系碩士班/碩士(2021年)

https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2021.00362

摘要

臺北自上世紀戰後以來，見證了臺灣經濟從快速發展到面對轉型的挑戰與掙扎，然而我們所處的都市空間也是，從過去吸引廣大的勞動人口前來工作的「工業城市」，隨著八十年代面對全球化的經濟結構轉型，城市已逐漸轉變成以第三級產業（服務性經濟）為基礎的城市，城市不再只是工作，而是我們居住和生活的地方，從過去的「工業城市」轉變成為「生活城市」，在這樣劇烈的轉變過程，我們所生活的環境面臨許多問題和挑戰，包括未來產業發展、全球暖化下的極端氣候、高齡化與少子化、高失業率與貧富差距、居住正義和歷史文化保存等等，複雜且棘手的「都市再生」議題，面對這些問題我們該如何因應，我想是此時此刻最重要且不可迴避的問題。

本研究企圖在近年來對於「社會基礎設施」新的研究與討論下，為都市再生尋找新的可能與契機，相較於都市再生案例多以社區或區域間的群體社會「關係」為基礎，在「交往」中整合想法與資源，「以關係與交往改變社會」；然而社會學角度的社會基礎設施以公共空間出發，以「空間」介入社會所產生的「空間作用」，連結人群與資源，「以空間改變社會」。

研究方法以都市空間相關理論與台灣與鄰近國家的都市再生案例出發，在理論與案例的綜合基礎上，提出「社會基礎設施的理論分析架構」，以此作為「社會基礎設施的視角」，對於臺北的都市空間發展脈絡與空間個案作進一步的觀察與討論。從社會基礎設施的視角看臺北的都市發展，理解空間與社會間的交互生產關係，都市空間可以是意識形態的象徵與政策的載體、也可以與文化產業結合、同時更是社會服務網絡。經濟發展與社會民主化的進程，讓過去僅有政府由上而下的政策規劃與建設，漸漸出現由下而上的公民參與，豐富與包容社會更多元的聲音；伴隨著科技與網路發展，社會基礎設施更是打破實體的框架，以更彈性、多元與跨越時空的新型態，成為連結彼此的群體行動與共享機制。以空間個案而言，在理論分析架構下，不同象限與案例間移動的交互關係，可以了解到空間個案的發展背景與面對都市再生下，透過空間性質與空間形成之社會過程的改變策略。

「社會基礎設施是實體空間，也是空間作用下產生的社會關係」，以社會基礎設施的視角，都市其實就是人與人之間的日常生活，我們應該透過更貼近真實生活的方式，思考人與人、人與都市間的互動關係，「社會基礎設施」應該回歸到「社會服務」與「生活照顧」，以滿足當下面對的社會問題與需求，更希望以社會基礎設施的概念，了解其背後的價值與重建公民生活的潛能，以空間（實體與非實體）做為社會連結，讓社會極化與對立找到解方。

關鍵字

社會基礎設施 ； 都市再生 ； 公共空間 ； 社會關係 ； 社會聯繫

並列摘要

Since the end of the war in the last century, Taipei has witnessed the rapid development of Taiwan’s economy to the challenges of transformation. However, the urban space we live in is also, from an “industrial city” that attracted a large number of laborers to work in the past. Facing the economic structural transformation of globalization in the 1980s, cities have gradually transformed into cities based on tertiary industries. Cities are no longer just about jobs, but places where we live. The “industrial city” has been transformed into a “living city”. In such a drastic transformation process, the environment we live in is facing many problems and challenges, including future industrial development, global warming, aging and declining population, housing justice, historical
preservation, etc., are complex and thorny issues of“urban regeneration”. How we should deal with these issues which is the most important and unavoidable issue at this moment.

This research attempts to find new possibilities for urban regeneration based on the new research on“social infrastructure.” Compared with urban regeneration cases, they are more based on the social“relationships”of communities or regions. Integrate ideas and resources in “communication” then “change society with relationships and interactions.”However, the social infrastructure from a sociological perspective starts from public space and uses “space” to intervene in society, and the resulting "place effects" connects people and resources, then “change society with space.”

The research method is based on the theory of urban space and the urban regeneration case of Taiwan and neighboring countries. Based on the comprehensive theory and case, the “theoretical analysis framework of social infrastructure” is proposed as a “perspective of social infrastructure.” Make further discussions on the development context and spatial cases of Taipei's urban space.

Look at urban development of Taipei from the perspective of social infrastructure, and understand the interactive production relationship between space and society. Urban space can be a symbol of politics and ideology, it can also be integrated with cultural industries, and it is also a social service network. The process of economic development and social democratization has gradually transformed the top-down policies and plans of the government into bottom-up citizen participation, enriching and tolerating more diverse voices in society; along with the development of internet, social infrastructure breaks the physical framework and becomes a group action and sharing mechanism that connects each other with a new style that is more flexible, diversified, and spans time and space. In terms of space cases, under the framework of theoretical analysis, the interaction between different quadrants and cases can understand the development background of space cases and the changing strategies of the space properties and the social process of space formation in face of urban
regeneration.

“Social infrastructure is a physical space, and it is also a social relationship generated under the place effects.” From the perspective of social infrastructure, the city is actually the daily life between people. We should think about the relationship between people in a way closer to real life. The interaction between people, people and the city. “Social infrastructure” should return to “social services” and “life care” to meet the current social problems and needs, and hope to use the concept of social infrastructure to understand the value behind it and rebuild the potential of civic life. Use space (physical and non-physical) as social connection to find a solution to social polarization and opposition.

並列關鍵字

Social Infrastructure ； Urban Regeneration ； Public space ； Social Relation ； Social Tie

參考文獻

參考文獻

山崎亮（2015）《社區設計 : 重新思考「社區」定義, 不只設計空間, 更要設計「人與人之間的連結」 = Community design 》（莊雅琇譯）臉譜出版。

山崎亮（2018）《社區設計的時代 : 用不造物的設計概念打造二十一世紀理想社會,全面探究社區設計的工作奧義、設計總體方針, 以及如何與社群團體培養合作默契》（莊雅琇譯）臉譜出版。

天下雜誌人文出版部（2016）《上好一村. 2, 三十五個同村共好心故事》。天下雜誌股份有限公司出版。

王本壯、李丁讚、李永展、洪德仁、陳其南（2014）《落地生根 : 台灣社區營造的理論與實踐》。唐山出版社出版。