- 學位論文
明代《文心雕龍》學研究─以明人序跋與楊慎、曹學佺評注為範圍
A research of scholarship of Wen- Shin- Diau- Lung in Ming dynasty ——Taking the forewords、afterpieces in Ming and Yang 、Tsau`s criticism for instance.
摘要
《文心雕龍》學自二十世紀初以來蓬勃發展，至今研究成果斐然，然而學者們普遍 認為明代乃是《龍》學醞釀之時，因此關於劉勰的文藝思想，甚乏闡發，故關於明人的 相關的意見和批評，多未能予以重視。本文所作，即試圖反思此成見，因此以明人諸《 文心雕龍》序跋，與楊慎、曹學佺二家之評語為範圍，歸納出明人對於《文心雕龍》的 普遍關注點為何？其關注點於後世又有何意義？而楊、曹二氏之批評，果然沒有對於劉 勰的文藝思想有所闡發嗎？是否因為簡短零碎、缺乏系統，因此毫無見地呢？本文於焉 開展： 第一章〈緒論〉，先陳述本文研究動機、範圍與方法等等。 第二章〈明人《文心雕龍》序跋中的關注議題〉，針對序跋部分，發現明人對於《 文心雕龍》的結構，普遍以上下二篇視之，並認為〈辨騷〉篇應當屬於文體論。並能從 其他外緣資料著手，探討劉勰其人其書與佛教之關係。而明人的這些意見，對於後世的 相關議題研究，均具影響性。另在時代須要之下，《文心雕龍》在明代的地位大幅提昇 ，甚至被稱為奇書，為時人目中文章寫作的指導範本，但也有人質疑其為六朝綺靡文風 之產物，這些質疑在序跋之中，皆可見作者的回應與反駁。 第三章〈楊慎與其《文心雕龍》評注〉，先簡介楊慎學術與生平，以及評點《文心 雕龍》之體例，並論證楊慎對於劉勰文意，實有巧妙之闡發，諸如對《楚辭》之評論、 通變的文學觀、劉勰的公文寫作通則，均能提出一語中的的見解，另外，基於楊慎重視 情性的文學觀，他極力讚美劉勰〈明詩〉篇中對詩的界義，並且抨擊宋人論詩不當之處 ，以及將該篇與鍾嶸《詩品》互相比較，作出論斷。對於「風骨」這組文學概念，也有 獨到見解。 第四章〈曹學佺與其《文心雕龍》評注〉，先簡介曹學佺學術與生平事蹟，再指出 在曹氏的評語之中，企圖建立《文心雕龍》整體性的理論，並且以緯書反面凸顯出劉勰 重視情性的文學觀，而此文學觀又為曹氏所提煉，提出宗尚自然的文學觀。 第五章〈明代《文心雕龍》學的總評〉，總結前文，並指出楊、曹二是評語的失當之處，以及整體明代《文心雕龍》學的影響。 第六章〈結論〉，說明本文重要論點及研究成果。
並列摘要
Scholarship of Wen- Shin- Diau- Lung has been efflorescent since 20th A.D ,but to Ming dynasty, today scholars always consider it is a foundation age for scholarship of Wen- Shin- Diau- Lung, and it is few to report. But, the scholars of Ming Dynasty, Do they have no any achievement that could consult for us ? This paper will try to introspect this prejudice, and taking he forewords、afterpieces and Yang-Shen`s 、Tsau Shiue-Chiuag`s criticism for instance. The first chapter is Introduction, about the motive、scope of this research, existing research results and catalogue of this thesis .The secondary chapter, by the observation to several forewords and afterpieces of Wen- Shin- Diau- Lung writed by Ming scholars, we can find out the widespread viewpoints and focus of them to Wen- S hin- Diau- Lung, and the viewpoints are influential to the research of posterity , and we also can find out its times meaning in Ming dynast. In the third chapter , we discussed Yang-Shen`s criticism to Wen- Shin- Diau- Lung. First , we introduced Yang`s life and academic achievements, then argued Yang`s criticism are actually helpful for us to comprehend Liou-shie`s literature thought, as Liou`s literature view of changes and writing principle of the official document . And to 「Wind and Bone」 this traditionally Chinese literature conception , Yang also offered his special views. In the fourth chapter, we discussed Tsau Shiue-Chiuag`s criticism to Wen- Shin- Diau- Lung. First , we introduced Tsau Shiue-Chiuag`s life and academic achievements, then we pointed out Tsau`s attempt to build a complete theory of Wen- Shin- Diau- Lung by「Fen」 and 「Heart」 two literature conception, and highlighted that temperament-valued literature view of Liou-shie by Wei(緯).Then Tsau further pointed out his nature-valued literature view. Fifth chapter is conclusion, We concluded all of preceding paragraphs, and pointed out the imperfections of Yang`s and Tsau`s criticism, then pointed out the influence of entire Scholarship of Wen- Shin- Diau- Lung of Ming dynasty. Finally, listed up the references of this thesis. Sixth chapter is conclusion . we briefly introduced the important viewpoint and the achievement of the paper.
參考文獻
被引用紀錄
延伸閱讀
- 傅想容（2016）。明人品讀《金瓶梅》的文人視角－以序跋及崇禎本評點為考察對象。漢學研究集刊，(22)，45-73。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18194427-201606-201609020019-201609020019-45-73
- 蔡宗陽（2010）。《文心雕龍•序志》詮證（上）。國文天地，(299)，39-46。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10159975-201004-201104210010-201104210010-39-46
- 蔡宗陽（2010）。《文心雕龍•序志》詮證（下）。國文天地，(300)，47-56。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10159975-201005-201006280028-201006280028-47-56
- 孫書磊（2011）。Study of Rare Versions of the Yu Zhi Huan Chuanqi of the Qing Dynasty──With a Study of the Discovery of Wu Mei's Manuscript of Preface to the Yu Zhi Huan Chuanqi。戲劇研究，(8)，1-20。https://doi.org/10.6257/2011.8001
- 黃聖松、楊受讓（2021）。The Research on Those Who ＂Li-meng＂ (to Participate in the Ceremony of Treaty of Alliance) in ＂Chun Qiu Jing＂ and ＂Zuo Zhuan＂ Were ＂Qing＂。嘉大中文學報，(14)，183-210。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=20733690-202103-202106230019-202106230019-183-210