探討設計思考對大學生學習動機及學習成效影響之研究－以電機系專題實驗為例

The Influence of Design Thinking on College Students’ Learning Motivation And Learning Outcomes - A Case Study of “Project Experiment” in ECE Department

張家銘(Jia-Ming Zhang)

指導教授 ： 劉寅春

淡江大學/工學院/電機工程學系機器人工程碩士班/碩士(2020年)

https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2020.00652

摘要

本研究將107學年度電機系開設之專題實驗課程作為研究對象，透過教學方式的重新設計，打造全新面貌之電機專題課程，讓學生能以實務角度應用電機系專業知識，並運用電機知識於原型開發。課程將設計思考要素融入後，學生必須在一學年的課程當中執行雙鑽石設計流程(The Double Diamond Design Process)，以此方式了解淡江大學的各類型場域，確認場域中的真實問題，最後在學期末的報告中，使用電機工程的專業知識嘗試解決問題。
　　定量研究部分，本研究採用非對等控制組設計進行，研究成果表示時間管理及團隊互動之學習成果有顯著提升，且p值小於0.05，表示實驗後成果具有顯著差異，而針對實驗組控制組之成對樣本T檢定，確認實驗組學生在經過設計課程後，學習成效的提升高於控制組。
　　定性研究部分，採用課堂觀察法及訪談法實施。研究中可發現當組員對單元活動展現出熱情，亦或團隊內有可帶領組員完成任務的領導者學生出現時，該組在課堂中較能迅速組織隊伍，且快速根據教學目標完成任務，而當課程中有擅長報告的同學出現時，團隊在成果呈現上則較有優勢。
　　此外，本研究也針對實驗組採用了半結構式的訪談方法，從此訪談可以得知電機系專題課程融入設計思考後，學生明顯有動機上的提升，而學生對課程更有興趣之後，也能使課程更加貼近實務導向，達到有效的課程整合效果。
　　本研究之貢獻，包含專題實驗課程之安排及規劃，課程內容、教學大綱擬定，課程執行的方式。研究也詳細說明了各課程的實施策略、問卷設計及研究設計的方式。

關鍵字

工程教育 ； 設計思考 ； 合作學習 ； 雙鑽石設計流程

並列摘要

This research takes the project experiment courses offered by the Department of Electrical Engineering in the 107 academic year as the research object. Through the redesign of teaching methods, a brand-new electrical project courses are created, so that students can apply electrical professional knowledge from a practical perspective and use electrical knowledge in prototypes. After integrating the design thinking elements into the course, students must implement The Double Diamond Design Process in the course of one academic year to understand the various fields of Tamkang University and confirm the real problems in the field. Finally, in the report at the end of the semester, use the professional knowledge of electrical engineering to try to solve the problem.
In the quantitative research part, this research adopts the non-equivalent control group design. The research results indicate that the learning results of time management and team interaction have been significantly improved (p-value < .05) , indicating that the results after the experiment have significant differences, and for the experimental group control group The paired sample T test confirms that the students in the experimental group have a higher learning effect than the control group after the designed course.
The qualitative research part is implemented using classroom observation and interview methods. In the research, it can be found that when the group members show enthusiasm for the unit activities, or when there is a leader student in the team who can lead the group members to complete the task, the group can organize the team quickly in the classroom and complete the task quickly according to the teaching goal. When there are students who are good at reporting in the course, the team has an advantage in the presentation of results.
In addition, this study also adopted a semi-structured interview method for the experimental group. From this interview, it can be learned that after the design thinking of the electrical engineering department is integrated, the students are obviously motivated, and the students are more interested in the courses. Make the curriculum closer to practical orientation and achieve an effective curriculum integration effect.
The contribution of this research includes the arrangement and planning of special experimental courses, the preparation of course content, syllabus, and the way of course implementation. The research also explained in detail the implementation strategies, questionnaire design and research design methods of each course.

並列關鍵字

Engineering Education ； Design Thinking ； Cooperative Learning ； Double Diamond Design Process

參考文獻

[1] YuHsuan,Lien, ChunMing,Yang, and DingHau,Huang, “The research of designthinking process through the empathy acase study of design thinking in ming chiuniversity of technology,” Industrial Design Magazine, no. 139, pp. 60–65, Jan 2019.

[2] R. Ministry of Education, Education Policy White Paper. Ministry of Education,R.O.C., 2001.

[3] ——, The Ministry of Education subsidizes and mentored colleges and universities topromote the key points of the schoolwidecurriculum innovation program with generaleducation at the core., 4 2007.

[4] ShunPo,Chiu and HueyWen,Chou, “Discussion on the factors influencing the satisfactionof university information management subject learning: From the perspective ofsocial cognitive theory,” Vanung Journal, no. 33, pp. 269–280, Jul 2011.

[5] JiannChyuan,Wang, “Reflections on the oem model of taiwan’s hightechindustry,”Economic Outlook Bimonthly, no. 99, pp. 65–69, May 2005.