透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.219.206.240
  • 學位論文

基於概念圖之學習診斷與個人化教材之研究

The Study of Personalized Teaching Materials and Learning Diagnosis on thebasis of Concept Map

指導教授 : 許輝煌

摘要


對於完成九年一貫課程的準高中生,在踏上高中、職後,常常會有課程銜接上的問題,尤其以數學這科最為嚴重。數學這門科目因有其學習的層次性,並且到了高中以後,對知識的難度、深度以及廣度的要求更高,跟國中數學其內容通俗具體,題型少而簡單有著滿大的差別,因此準高中生們在高中數學這塊領域更需要能自動自發學習;本論文提出一套個人化學習系統,利用概念繼承的理論,以國中數學教材為學習高中數學之先修教材,以高中數學為主要學習範疇;透過測量的方式,診斷出學習障礙,並提供個人化教材與補救教材進行學習;使學生能夠有效率自我學習,並且可讓教師系統化的掌握學生學習的成效。 本系統遵循部編的章節內容,將每一節的課程以概念為研讀的基本單位,並透過教師依其教學經驗,進行概念繼承連結;讓學生能學習完基本概念後,再往下一層概念學習,如此由淺入深一步一步的進行學習;除了課程外,並導入題庫細目與概念相連結,建立起系統診斷模型,以檢測學生的課程概念學習狀況。 在實作系統與實驗部份,我們將針對高中數學第一冊第2章數與座標2-1整數進行學習,在完成先修課程的前測後,將先修的迷失概念與新課程結合概念繼承產生個人化教材,讓學生進行學習;爾後,再進行第一次後測,若通過教師設定的標準值時,則往下一節課程進行學習;若未通過,則再研讀系統根據測驗所得的補救課程後,再進行測驗,若經過3次後測都未能通過,則系統mail知會教師,以進行瞭姐學生學習狀況,並開放下一節課程讓該生進入學習。實驗所得第二次學習課程測量成績的平均數高於第一次學習課程測量成績 2.40分,由此可瞭解本系統可有效提高學生學習效率。

並列摘要


In Taiwan, most freshmen in the senior high school who receive the nine-year consistence curriculum system always have difficulty in learning senior-high curriculums, particular in mathematics. For them, they do not have enough prior knowledge about mathematics in the junior high school. As a result, it is a big problem for them to accept the more advanced courses in senior high school. However, the major reason caused this problem is about the leaning strategy in mathematics. That is the study stages and it should be arranged or taught by step by step. Besides the learning strategy, most students should learn mathematics automatically in order to catch and adjust the advanced courses in the senior high school. For this reason, this thesis proposed a set of personalization learning system and used the theory of concept inheritance to structure study materials. The study material includes two parts: one is based on the materials in high school as a prior material to freshman in senior high school; the other is from the learning curriculum in senior high school. In addition, by testing it would diagnose individual’s learning disability and continue the make-up learning practice to encourage students to learn efficiently and offer a effective system to teachers to know students’learning outcomes. This learning system is based on the contents of the foundation mathematics in senior high school. Every chapter should be a basic unit to study. The teacher would teach the materials first in order to connect the prior concepts and structure students’ basic learning concept. The learning process should be step by step and be from the beginning to advance. Besides the course, the system will involve in the exercises data bases to line up the concept connection and then set up the system diagnose model to examine students’learning condition in the course. The procedure is: The test content of this study will include the chapter 2 and 2-1 ( mathematics Book 1 in the senior high school). After completing previously curriculum measure, the system will proceed the personalized teaching material composed of the loses concept of previously curriculum and the new curriculum. It can make the students carry on the study. Then, students will be asked to do the following procedure 3 times repeatedly. It will ask student to do test in the new curriculum. If the students pass this test, then they can skip this procedure and download a curriculum to proceed to study; If they can not pass, then they need to study make-up curriculum which be constructed by result of test and go on motioning this procedure. After finishing above procedure 3 times, if the students still can not pass, system will mail a letter to the teacher and make the teacher find out the learning condition of students. Then, the system will give the next curriculum and let students continue to study. If the mean value which obtained second measured of the new curriculum is higher than first measures of the new curriculum 2.40 points in this experimentation, it can prove this system can be enhance the student to study efficiency.

參考文獻


[2] Hui-huang Hsu, Chun-Jung Chen, and Wen-Pin Tai,( 2003) “Towards Error-Free and Personalized Web-Based Courses,” in Proc. 2003 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), pp. 99-104, Xi’an, China, March 27-29, 2003.
[9] Ausubel, D. P., (1968). “Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. ”, New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
[12] Goldsmith, T. E., Johnson, P. J., and Acton, W. H. (1991). “Assessing structural knowledge.”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, pp. 88-96, 1991.
[13] Joel J. Mintzes, James H. Wandersee and Joseph D. Novak(1998). “Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist View. ”, California: Academic Press., 1998.
[17] Gwo-Jen Hwang, Chia-Lin Hsiao and Judy C.R. Tseng (2003), “A Computer-Assisted Approach for Diagnosing Student Learning Problems in Science Courses,” Journal of Information Science and Engineering, Vol. 19, No.2, pp. 229-248. ,2003.

延伸閱讀