透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.218.196.182
  • 學位論文

清代八旗下的文武關係

Civil-Military Relation of The Eight Banners System in Chung Dynasty

指導教授 : 洪陸訓

摘要


八旗者,努爾哈齊所定之國體,它不僅是強而有力的軍事組職,同時也是卓有成效的行政組織和經濟組織。所謂「jakūn gūsa be gurun booi fuleh da」(八旗者,國家之根本),就成為清一代不變之訓示。 但在初期,全國盡隸於八旗,以八和碩貝勒為旗主,旗人皆為其下屬,且對旗主有君臣之分。是故君主理論上也不能掌握他旗之武力。這對於統治者而言,都是相當不安全的,因而清歷代皇帝,無不絞盡腦汁,企圖轉化八旗制度,以達到「文人統制」。使清朝的政軍互動、軍事專業乃至於軍民關係都都發生劇烈的變化。

並列摘要


The Eight Banners. The system of the government was established of the Nurhaci. It is not only strong military forces, but also effective administrative and economical organization. So-called「jakūn gūsa be gurun booi fuleh da」(The Eight Banners are national foundation), turn into constant instructions given by a superior of the Ching dynasty. But early day, the whole country was subordinate to the Eight Banners system. the eight direction rulers(jakūn hoŠo belie)were leader of the banner, All bannermen were inferiors, and were must faithful to his liteutenant general of a Banner. The emperor cannot direct control armed force of other Banner theoretically. It is very dangerous to the ruler. Therefore all the successive emperors of the Qing dynasty, rocked brains invariably, tried to transform the Eight Banners system, came to「Civilian Control」. Thus political-Military interaction, Military Profession and Military-civil Relation take place violent change in the Ching dynasty.

參考文獻


陳文石,《明清政治社會史編》。台北:臺灣學生書局,1991年11月。
黃光亮,《中國武舉制度之研究》。台北:振英,1977年6月。
陳捷先,〈皇太極的國事夢〉,《歷史月刊—第二百二十期》,2006年5月。
Samuel P. Huntington著,洪陸訓等譯,《軍人與國家:文武關係的理論與政治》。台北:時英出版社,2006年7月。
洪陸訓,〈軍事專業主義之興起及其內涵—杭廷頓的軍事專業主義論〉,《復興岡學報—第五十七期》,1996年。

被引用紀錄


陳秀鳳(2013)。清代前期火器之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2013.01100

延伸閱讀


國際替代計量