透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.135.183.187
  • 學位論文

臺灣與日本檔案開放應用法規之比較研究

A Comparative Study on Law of Public Access to Records between Taiwan and Japan

指導教授 : 林巧敏

摘要


為了解臺灣與日本檔案開放應用的背景與相關法規,作為臺灣未來修法的參考。本研究採用比較研究法,以臺灣與日本之檔案管理、政府資訊公開、個人資料保護及國家機密保護四部法規,作為研究對象,在了解此四部法規有關檔案開放應用的條文內涵後,藉由排列、比對臺灣與日本的法規條文內容,具體分析兩者的異同。 經比較分析,臺灣與日本在檔案管理、政府資訊公開、個人資料保護及國家機密保護法規的規範位階、規範形式、內容項目、法規之間的關聯等方面,雖然擁有類似的原則規範,但在細節上更有不少的差異,相較之下,臺灣部分法條內容是可以修正的。期望未來臺灣若進行相關法規的修法,斟酌參考日本法規,增進檔案開放應用法規體系的完善。

並列摘要


In addition to having a refrence for future amendment, this thesis tries to know more about the background and the laws of public access to records in Taiwan and Japan. Using the method of comparative study, this thesis take the four acts in Taiwan and Japan- the management of records, the openness of government information, the protection of personal data and the protection of national secrets- as the research objects. After understanding the articles relative to public access of records in these four acts, this thesis analyzes the differences between Taiwan and Japan by listing the words of articles in both countries’ laws. After comparing and analyzing, there are differences no matter in legal hierarchy, legal formation or the contents and the relations of all acts between Taiwan and Japan. Although both countries have some similar principals or concepts, still many differences exist in detail. What this thesis find out is that there’s need for amending Taiwan’s laws. If Taiwan would try to amend the laws of public access to records in the future, the legislators could consult the laws of Japan. Finally, this thesis hopes to help improving the entire legal system.

參考文獻


中文文獻
尤重道(2013)。政府資訊公開與限制公開之分際暨案例分析。國會月刊,4(1)總號477,66-95。
王玉民(1994)。社會科學研究方法原理。臺北市:洪葉文化。
王珍珠(2003)。國家機密保護法初探。檔案季刊,2(1),68-75。
王珍珠(2006)。政府資訊公開法對現行檔案法規之影響。檔案季刊,5(3),29-44。

延伸閱讀