重返秩序的超驗基礎：沃格林的法律哲學

The Return to the Transcendental Ground of the Order: Eric Voegelin’s Philosophy of Law

黃彥瑜(Huang Yen-Yu)

指導教授 ： 江玉林

國立政治大學/法學院/法律學系/碩士(2022年)

https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202201573

摘要

沃格林（Eric Voegelin）認為法律規範性的來源是「本體論上的應然」（Ought in the ontological sense)，或者說是⼈在超驗的真正秩序與經驗的⼈造秩序之中體驗到的張⼒。這樣的法哲學建⽴在⼀種哲學⼈類學之上，將⼈看作在超驗與經驗、彼世與此世之間的存有。⼈因來⾃超驗端的牽引，⽽體驗到規範性。這樣的法哲學是神祕主義的。此外，只有根植於超驗與經驗之間的神祕主義法哲學，才能正當地導引⼈對於絕對之物的追求。藉此，它避免法秩序衰敗為沃格林稱為「諾斯替主義」的失序，進⽽⾛向極權主義的悲劇。

關鍵字

沃格林 ； 法律哲學 ； 規範性 ； 神祕主義

並列摘要

Eric Voegelin considers the source of the normativity of law to be “Ought in the ontological sense”, or the tension experienced by man between the transcendental true order and the empirical man-made order. A legal philosophy of this kind presupposes a sort of philosophical anthropology that treats a human as a being between transcendence and mundanity. Man is guided by the Transcendent, and hence he experiences normativity. Such a philosophy of law is mystical. Furthermore, only a mystical philosophy of law based between transcendence and mundanity can rightfully guide man’s pursuit of the Absolute. Thereby, it prevents the legal order from decaying into disorder which Voegelin names Gnosticism and eventually collapsing into the tragedy of totalitarianism.

並列關鍵字

Eric Voegelin ； Philosophy of law ； Normativity ； Mysticism

參考文獻

英文、德文部分

Arnold, Eckhart (2007). Eric Voegelin als Schüler Hans Kelsens, erchienen in: Der Kreis um Hans Kelsen. Die Anfangsjahre der Reinen Rechtslehre, Robert Walter, Clemens Jabloner, Klaus Zeleny Hrsg., Wien, 2007.

Chiassoni, Pierluigi (2014). Kelsen on Natural Law Theory: An Enduring Critical Affair, doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.2976 .

Cohen, Julius (1978). The Political Element in Legal Theory: A Look at Kelsen's Pure Theory, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 88, No. 1, Nov., 1978.

Cooper, Barry & Bruhn, Jodi ed. (2008). VOEGELIN RECOLLECTED: CONVERSATIONS ON A LIFE, Columbia, Missouri: University of Missouri Press.