論專利侵害鑑定報告之法律性質：以證據法為中心

Legal Nature of an Evidential Report for Patent Infringement Analysis: An Aspect of Evidence Law

蔡宗恒(Zong-Heng Tsai)

指導教授 ： 陳秉訓

共同指導教授 ： 江雅綺

國立臺北科技大學/人文與社會科學學院/智慧財產權研究所/碩士(2014年)

https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2014.00308

摘要

鑒於智慧財產法院於民國97年7月成立至今，其有別於一般法院，設置技術審查官一職，主要就我國關於智慧財產權相關之案件而為審理，其中本文針對專利侵害鑑定報告於專利侵害之民事訴訟程序中之證據能力地位而為歷年重要判決之選錄為主體，並參酌上訴至最高法院之判決而為討論。本文從民事訴訟法關於證據能力、證據種類之學說、學理為出發，並認為所謂「專利侵害鑑定報告」者，於證據法理之中，應係歸屬於「私文書」之一種。後藉由歷年之智慧財產權法院與最高法院之判決整理發現，法院就「專利侵害鑑定報告」之評價，亦將其採為私文書之一種，與學說體系架構下之歸類相符，法院除就專利侵害鑑定報告之形式判斷外，亦會詳細審酌其報告書之實體內容而為法院心證之形成，然並不因此而受鑑定報告之鑑定結果拘束，亦會就其他證據而為判斷，並不因此而使得專利侵害鑑定報告之提出者為完全有利之認定。是以最終做成結論，認為專利侵權案件之涉訟雙方，於訴訟開始前，自應提起專利侵害鑑定報告書，以主張己身之權利受侵害或不侵權，然而仍應注意除此之外之證據資料，並於訴訟中提出，如此之舉證方式，才能夠於訴訟中使法院產生確信，進而獲得勝訴。

關鍵字

專利侵害鑑定報告 ； 專利侵權 ； 民事訴訟 ； 證據

並列摘要

Regarding the establishment of Intellectual Property Court on July 1st in 2008, it had separated the intellectual property related lawsuit from the normal Court. Since then, there has been a huge amount of intellectual property related lawsuit which had been judged. And because of the professional of the Intellectual Property Court, the judgment of the “evidential report for patent infringement analysis” should be very referential to the patentee or the infringer. So I collected some cases from Intellectual Property Court that I thought to be indicative, and the cases that appealed to the Supreme Court to discuss. In this article, I started form the Evidence Law of the Civil Procedure Law, and concluded evidential report for patent infringement analysis to be a kind of private document which can’t bind the judgment of the Court. And I analysis the cases I’ve collected, then found the Intellectual Property Court and the Supreme Court take the report as private document, just the same with the theory. So I conclude that not only the patentee but also the infringer should provide their own report to the Court to support their declaration, but that’s not sufficient to persuade the Court. So the patentee or the infringer should have provided other powerful evidence to effect the Court.

並列關鍵字

Evidential Report for Patent Infringement Analysis ； Patent Infringement ； Civil Procedure Law ； Evidence Law

參考文獻

[19] 曾華松（2007）。〈民刑事訴訟中智慧財產有效性抗辯之處理〉，《法令月刊》， 58卷，7期，頁10-35。

[31] 最高法院100年度台上字第284號判決。

[33] 最高法院100年度台上字第1843號判決。

[35] 最高法院102年度台上字第1185號判決。

書籍