高級職業學校教師申訴制度之研究

Research on the Faculty Appeal System in Senior Vocational Schools

周筆秀(Pi-Hsiu Chou)

指導教授 ： 林騰蛟

國立臺北科技大學/人文與科學學院/技術及職業教育研究所/碩士(2007年)

摘要

摘　要

論文名稱：高級職業學校教師申訴制度之研究 頁數：159
校所別：國立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所
畢業時間：九十五學年度第二學期 學位：碩士
研究生：周筆秀 指導教授：林騰蛟博士

關鍵詞：高級職業學校、教師申訴制度

本研究旨在瞭解高級職業學校教師對教師申訴制度意見的看法，採用文獻分析法與問卷調查法，以自編「高級職業學校教師申訴制度調查問卷」為研究工具，針對臺灣地區的職校教師，採分層比例隨機抽樣進行調查，共計寄發530份問卷，回收有效問卷為513份，有效問卷回收率為96.8％。
本研究以描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、柯-史單一樣本檢定、相依樣本t檢定等進行資料分析，獲致研究結論如下：
一、是否曾經參加教師申訴業務研討會或相關會議背景變項之職校教師，對教師申訴制度的功能之意見呈顯著差異，其餘不同背景變項教師的意見均無顯著差異。
二、公私立學校、不同學歷、不同職務及是否為學校教師會成員等四項背景變項職校教師對教師申訴制度的申訴事項之意見均呈顯著差異。
三、職校教師對教師申訴制度有助增進組織內部檢討、溝通及減少衝突的發生，具有高度的認同。
四、職校教師對停聘、解聘與不續聘等任用權益受損時，可以向申評會提起申訴，具有高度的認同。
五、職校教師對教師申訴制度組織，認為申評會委員中應有法律學者或專家在內，具有高度的期望。
六、職校教師對教師申訴制度的申訴程序，認為申評會委員對於申訴案件有利害關係者，應自行迴避，不得參與評議，具有高度的期望。
七、職校教師對教師申訴制度的申訴評議決定，認為學校未能落實執行申訴評議決定時，主管機關應採取行政監督方式促其實現，具有高度的期望。
八、職校教師對教師申訴制度的組織，在理想上與實際上看法的落差，除申評會委員人數，由所設機關首長遴聘無顯著差異外，其餘均有顯著差異。其中以申評會委員中應有法律學者或專家在內落差最大。
九、職校教師對教師申訴制度的申訴程序，在理想上與實際上看法的落差，均有顯著差異，其中以申評會委員對於申訴案件有利害關係者，應自行迴避，不得參與評議落差最大。
十、職校教師對教師申訴制度的申訴評議決定，在理想上與實際上的落差，均有顯著差異，其中以學校未能落實執行申訴評議決定時，主管機關應採取行政監督方式促其實現落差最大。
最後，研究者分別針對教育行政機關、學校及後續研究提出具體建議。

關鍵字

高級職業學校 ； 教師申訴制度

並列摘要

ABSTRACT

Title：Research on the Faculty Appeal System Pages：159
in Senior Vocational Schools
School：National Taipei University of Technology
Department：Institute of Technological ＆ Vocational Education
Time：June, 2007 Degree：Master
Researcher：Chou, Pi-Hsiu Advisor：Dr. Lin, Teng-Chiao

Keywords：senior vocational school, faculty appeal system

This research aims at understanding the views of senior vocational school teachers toward the faculty appeal system. Literature review and questionnaire survey were adopted as the research method, while stratified random sampling was used to collect data from advanced vocational school teachers throughout the island. Out of 530 distributed questionnaires, 513 were returned valid (valid return rate=96.8%)
Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics, independent t-test, pair t-test, one-way ANOVA and one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The results of this study are as follows:
1. Regarding the functions of the appeal system, teachers who have attended faculty plea seminars or relevant meetings hold significantly different views from those who have not. None of the other teacher background variables has led to significant differences.
2. Regarding the contents of pleas to propose, four teacher background variables were found to be significant, including the type of school served (public vs. private), teacher’s education level, teacher’s job position, and membership of the school teacher committee.
3. Vocational school teachers highly agree that the faculty appeal system helps to promote internal review and communication inside the organization, hence reducing unnecessary conflicts.
4. Vocational school teachers highly agree that teachers may propose pleas to the Committee when their rights or interests are harmed, such as the temporary termination of teaching contract, dismissal, or the ceasing of further employment.
5. Vocational school teachers highly expect that there should be law scholars or experts in the Faculty Complaint Committee.
6. Vocational school teachers highly expect that any members of the Faculty Complaint Committee should not take part in the arbitration of a faculty plea if they have interests in or relations to the plea case.
7. Vocational school teachers highly expect that the competent authority should urge the realization of the arbitration decisions through administrative supervision when the school concerned is unable to implement them.
8. Regarding the organization of the Faculty Appeal Committee, there are significant differences between teacher perceptions and reality in all of the aspects except for the number of committee members to be selected by the chiefs of the organization. The biggest discrepancy is the inclusion of law scholars or experts in the committee.
9. Regarding the procedures of making appeals, there are significant differences between teacher perceptions and reality in all of the relevant aspects. The biggest discrepancy is whether or not a committee member should avoid cases if he or she has interests in or relations to the plea case.
10. Regarding the arbitration decisions of a plea case, there are significant differences between ideal and reality in all aspects. The biggest discrepancy is whether or not the competent organization should take administrative supervision to implement the arbitration decisions that the school fails to enforce.

Finally, the researcher proposes concrete suggestions for the reference of the educational administrative institutes, the schools and future researchers.

並列關鍵字

senior vocational school ； faculty appeal system

參考文獻

林俊益（2003）。刑事訴訟法概論。台北：學林文化事業公司。

教育部中部辦公室（2006）。載於台北市、臺灣省、高雄市高級職業學校名冊，1、

衛民（2001）。公立大學教師申訴制度分析─論升等案與大法官釋字第462號解釋。台大法學論叢，30(4)，37-74。

林威志（1997）。我國公立國民中小學教師申訴制度之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。

Coleman, C. J. (1990). Managing Labor Relations in the Public Sector, San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass Publishers.