網路同儕互評評量之構念分析

Construct Analysis of Web-Based Peer Assessment

吳柏蒼(Po-Tsang Wu)

指導教授 ： 劉寶鈞

元智大學/資訊學院/資訊工程學系/碩士(2004年)

摘要

網際網路快速的發展，使得學習評量變得更多元化，而網路同儕互評便是一種快速且方便的評量活動，藉由網路同儕互評評量能提供更多的回饋資訊讓我們參考研究。本研究將藉由探測學生在網路同儕互評時的認知結構，進而分析其構念結構差異度：衝突(Conflict)、一致(Consensus)、對比(Contrast)與對應(Correspondence)四種。文中將對2個不同班級課程且不同評量設計的活動進行構念結構分析，並進而探討構念結構對於網路同儕互評評量之信度的關係。
我們希望探討各種不同類型的構念差異度對於信度是否有不同的影響。不同的互評評量科目與活動設計，其構念結構差異度與信度的關係。期望能藉由探測學生構念結構差異度的機制，引導學生的學習活動，增加學習的效果，進而提升同儕互評活動時的信度。

關鍵字

構念結構 ； 一致 ； 衝突 ； 對比 ； 對應 ； 同儕互評

並列摘要

By the fast growing of internet, the learning assessment is getting variable. And the Web-base Peer Assessment is a fast and convenient assessment. By the Web-base peer assessment, we can retrieved more feedback data for research. This paper analyze the construct variation of students by retrieving students’ cognitive structure. (Conflict, Consensus, Contrast and Correspondence). This paper analyze two different class , course , and different design assessment. And then discuss the relation between construct structure and web-based peer assessment reliability.
This paper discuss the effects of different construct structure type with reliability and the relation between different course and different design. By retrieving the students’ construct variation, we hope to guide the students’ learning activities , increase the effects of learning and improve the reliability of peer assessment.

並列關鍵字

Construct structure ； Consensus ； Conflict ； Contrast ； Correspondence ； Peer Assessment

參考文獻

[1].Boud, D. and N. Falchikov, Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 1989 , 18: p. 529 — 549

[3].C.C. Tsai， S.S.J. Lin & S-M. Yuan， Students’ use of web-based concept map testing and strategies for learning， Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , March 2001 ,Vol. 17， No. 1.

[5].Falchikov, N. Peer feedback marking: development peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 1995 , 32, 175-187.

[6].Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 2000 , 70(3), 287-322.

[7].Fallows, S., & Chandramohan, B. Multiple approaches to assessment: reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 2001 , 6(2), 229-246.