產業發展與文化藝術發展在台灣往往是被分開討論的兩個面向,尤其是在高科技產業的討論中,但這樣的偏頗情況會形成區域發展的不均衡,產業空間與藝術空間其實應該被並置考量與規劃的,這也是本研究想要探討的重點,希望能提供未來科學園區空間改善的方向。 本文即針對這些狀況提出改善的具體意見,以做為未來科學園區中藝術空間建置與改善的參考。本論文的章節分配,先在「前言」中說明研究之動機、目的、架構、方法、章節內容及研究過程中所面臨的問題與解答。第一章先探討台灣的產業發展進程及高科技產業在台灣的開端與逐年成長而成為主流產業的現象,也就竹科目前的產業空間與藝術空間分佈進行現狀的研究,並就研究研究的結果進行探討以及兩個空間進行結合的可行性。 第二章就台灣區域競爭力衡量模式進行探討,接著援引Richard Florida 的 3T 創意經濟發展模式及知識經濟體下競爭力衡量模式,探討區域競爭力在新的經濟體系下評量模式的轉變,人力資源為現今地區發展的重要利基,而從人為出發點的生活、文化與藝術層面發展也同樣躍而成為地區發展的重要利基點。第三章以量化研究與質化研究兩種方式著手,藉由研究結果瞭解空間使用者的想法,以作為研究的參考並作為研究過程中獲得問題解答的管道之一。 最後建議針對竹科藝術空間建置的現況,提出做為參考改進的方向,提供竹科以及其他科學園區規劃做為未來發展的建議。
In Taiwan, it may be argued that plans of industrial and high-tech production development are often lacking in concern or support for local art and other cultural activities, even if this oversight or indifference has proven to be unhealthy for balanced distribution of quality in regional growth. My thesis seeks to rectify this situation first by stressing the need for integrating “art” and “production” types of space in any such project and by suggesting options in which this may be achieved in future industrial zones or scientific parks. The preface supplies an outline for the motivation, object and scope of the research, describes themes in each chapter and contains a note on methodology and other technical issues. Chapter 1 opens with a historical overview of industrial production in Taiwan, with highlight on areas devoted to high-tech researches, such as the HsinChu Science Park. Topics such as available room for art in HsinChu Science Park and how possible it is to combine art and production types of space are discussed here. Chapter 2 investigates the subject of measuring regional competitiveness in Taiwan and cites the model of Richard Florida's "3T" in the development of creative industries and knowledge-based economy: Technology, Talent and Tolerance. Since qualities in human resources and in art and cultural activities are directly related, their integration is critical to regional development. Chapter 3 publishes a survey conducted among users in HsinChu Science Parks and interprets their responses both quantitatively and qualitatively. We think the results are significant both as research reference and as inspiration to solve the problem outlined in the preface. The final chapter suggests points for improvement regarding both current space for art in HsinChu Science Park and other future projects.