This study focuses on the effect of auditing fees on audit quality. I use two variables, analyst forecast error and forecast dispersion, to measure audit quality. There are two issues. First, because other fees (or called non-auditing fees) can be manipulated by the companies and their auditors, other fees are negatively associated with the audit quality. My results suggest that forecast error is positively correlated to other fees. It is consistent with my hypothesis. However, the results from forecast dispersion are insignificant. Second, since the persistent auditors will be friendly with client, they have incentive to manipulate financial reporting when the company is in trouble. Thus, I predict that the changes in auditors will affect the audit quality. My empirical results show that the audit quality can be improved after auditors are removed.