以成本考量為基礎之共同模組探勘研究

An effective common module mining method under cost considerations

羅鈺婷(Yu-Ting Lo)

指導教授 ： 蔡介元

元智大學/工程學院/工業工程與管理學系/碩士(2009年)

https://doi.org/10.6838/YZU.2009.00306

摘要

隨著市場需求的改變，消費者需求變化越來越大，大量式生產的產品已經無法滿足大部分消費者的需求。企業為了增加競爭優勢，滿足消費者個人化的需求，大量客製化的生產模式因此因應而生。在大量客製化的生產模式中，模組化的生產方式，可使得企業在生產產品上更加彈性，且能同時滿足更多消費者多樣化的條件，此外企業導入模組化生產後，其生產模式及成本將會有所調動。
有鑑於此，本研究提出以成本分析為基礎之共同模組探勘方法。研究架構主要包含以下四個步驟：一、以Single-Level Tree (SLT，單階樹) 結構為基礎，將所有產品拆解成許多的SLT結構。二、以共同模組探勘方法對所有的SLT結構進行分析並取得共同模組。三、利用專案產生程序將共同模組組合成可行的專案。四、最後，透過成本分析計算執行ㄧ專案所需花費的成本，並將花費最小成本之專案回傳給使用者。本研究所提出的模組化生產，不僅可以達成產品多樣化及彈性化的目標，在，亦能幫助企業提昇生產效率，並以最低的花費得到最大的效益。

關鍵字

產品結構 ； 單階樹 ； 模組化 ； 成本分析

並列摘要

In current market-oriented business environment, product variation and customization is a critical way to satisfy customers’ diverse requirements. In order to achieve customer’s demand, production models in many enterprises are now changing to the mass customization production. Thus, modularity has played an important role in the development of the mass customization. It enables not only the ability to put the “mass” in mass customization, but also to configure the products according to the customer’s demand.
To address this problem, this research proposed an effective common module mining system under cost considerations. The system can derive common module from various product structures and decide which project will execute and spend less cost to produce products. The framework of the proposed system consists of four phases: 1. Single level trees generation procedure. 2. Common module mining procedure. 3. Project generation procedure. 4. Cost analysis on each project. With the proposed method, enterprises not only can produce the variety and flexibility products, but also produce products effectively and spend less cost to obtain larger benefit.

並列關鍵字

Product structure ； Single level tree ； Modularity ； Cost analysis

參考文獻

1.Blecker,T., Friedrich, G., Kaluza, B., Abdelkafi, N. and Kreutler, G. (2005), “Product Modularity in Mass Customization,” Integrated Series in Information Systems 7(3), pp. 163-179.

2.Chen, K. M. and Liu, R. J. (2005), “Interface strategies in modular product innovation,” Technovation 25 (7), pp. 771-782

3.He, D.W. and Kusiak, A. (1997), “Design of Assembly Systems for Modular Products,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 13 (5), pp. 646-655.

6.Gonzalez-Zugasti, J.P. and Otto, K.N. (2000), “Platform-based spacecraft design: A formulation and implementation procedure,” IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings 1, pp. 455-463.

11.Kidd, P. T. (1994), Agile Manufacturing Forging New Frontiers, Addison-Wesiey, New York.