乳癌在全球是最常被診斷的癌症之一,在台灣,乳癌高居女性癌症發生率之首。儘管目前已有多種乳癌的治療藥物,開發新的乳癌藥物仍相當重要,特別是對於化療後復發的乳癌患者。DNA損傷反應 (DDR) 和與其有關的修復機制在導致癌症扮演很重要的角色。或許是由於無法有效的修復DNA所造成的基因損傷,當癌細胞受到會造成DNA損傷的化療藥物作用時,會啟動一連串的DDR訊息傳遞網絡來保護自身的基因體。DDR的結果可能會造成細胞凋亡、細胞進行修復、細胞週期停止等。在先前的研究中,自大金星蕨的protoapigenone可經由抑制UV和cisplatin誘導產生的DDR而抑制乳癌細胞的存活性。本研究則主要比較protoapigenone和其化學合成衍生物738-5和738-7對DDR影響的差異。738-5與738-7對於MCF-7乳癌細胞的IC50分別為11.04和9.78 μM,也具有抑制MCF-7乳癌細胞形成球體的能力。Protoapigenone、738-5和738-7皆可抑制由hydroxyurea與doxorubicin誘導的ATM、Chk2及Chk1磷酸化,但只有738-5和738-7可抑制ATM蛋白質表現,且此現象具有劑量與時間依賴性。由實驗結果得知,738-5和738-7抑制MCF-7乳癌細胞的作用機轉與protoapigenone不盡相同,且可能是與氧化壓力的作用有關。
Breast cancer is one of the most common diagnosed malignancies among women worldwide. In Taiwan, women have the highest rate of getting breast cancer than other types of cancer. As a result, developing new treatment options is required for some particular situations, such as refractory to chemotherapy. Cancer receives DNA damage-based chemotherapy will activate DNA damage response (DDR) pathway to protect genomic stability. Either by arresting cell-cycle for DNA repair or inducing apoptosis, DDR can prevent damaged DNA propagates into daughter cells. In the previous research, plant-derived protoapigenone showed potent activity against breast cancer cell lines via inhibiting UV- and cisplatin-induced DDR. In the present study, we tested new synthetic protoapigenone derivatives, named 738-5 and 738-7, on DDR in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. We demonstrated 738-5 and 738-7 suppressed MCF-7 breast cancer cell line with IC50 of 11.04 and 9.78 μM, respectively. 738-5 and 738-7 also inhibited the sphere forming ability of MCF-7 cells. Probed precisely into their effect on DDR showed both 738-5 and 738-7 had a similar ability to inhibit doxorubicin- and hydroxyurea-induced ATR, Chk1, and Chk2 phosphorylation. Differently, 738-5 and 738-7, but not protoapigenone, could decrease ATM and Chk2 phosphorylation which in parallel with reducing ATM protein expression. In MCF-7 cells, 738-5 and 738-7 could reduce ATM protein expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Our results showed the mechanism of action for 738-5 and 738-7 is different from protoapigenone and it may be related to oxidative stress.