中文版「中心關係問卷」之發展

案主瞭解自己的「中心關係組型」(central relationship pattern)是人際關係治療的重點，Luborsky 與 Crits-Christoph(1976,1977,1990)以精神動力治療理論為背景，發展出具有臨床基礎及系統化測量「中心關係組型」的方法，稱之為「核心衝突關係主題法」(The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme method, CCRT)，而Barber,Foltz and Weinryb(1998)則編制「中心關係問卷」(The Central Relationship Questionnaire, CRQ) ，將「核心衝突關係主題法」的標準分類轉化成自評式七點量表。中文版「中心關係問卷」之編制與分析包括：1.項目分析、信度分析；2.受試者在父親、母親、重要他人等三種版本「中心關係問卷」結果之相關；3.以「關係事件派典晤談」為效標的效度分析；4.以「人際問題量表」為效標的效度分析；5.比較大學生與憂鬱症病人量表結果之差異，；6.比較中美受試者量表結果之差異。結果顯示：1.因素分析解釋量62.49%-68.20%，α信度.88-.94；2.除主要的「中心關係組型」外，尚有次組型的產生；3.「關係事件派典晤談」資料不足，無法完整分析；4.顯示合適的輻合效度(.19-.62)與區別效度(.00-.10)；5.問卷可有效區分正常組與憂鬱症病人；6.中美受試者在問卷表現上有文化差異。依據上述結果，提出四點建議：1.增加不同年齡層與職業別之樣本，以擴大問卷的應用範圍；2.形成本土化題庫，再進行問卷編制，則更具實用性；3.訂定得分標準，則更符合心理治療效果之評量4.「關係事件派典晤談」之質性分析須更明確，方能進行效標分析。

關鍵字

中心關係組型；核心衝突關係主題；中心關係量表；關係事件派典晤談

並列摘要

Understanding that the patients' “central relationship pattern ” is an important part in the interpersonal relationship psychotherapy plans. The core conflictual relationship theme Method, CCRT, developed by Luborsky and Crits-Christoph (1976,1977,1990) by psychodynamic formulations, has clinical foundation and systematized methods to measure “central relationship pattern”. Barber,Foltz and Weinryb (1998) developed the central relationship questionnaire, CRQ, that is the scale based on CCRT. The developments and analysis of Chinese version of CRQ are: 1. item analysis and reliability analysis; 2. the correlation of the result of three kinds of CRQ in the same subjects; 3. validity analysis by the relationship anecdotes paradigm interview, RAP, for criterion; 4. validity analysis by the inventory of interpersonal problems, IIP, for criterion ; 5. the comparison between normal group and depression patients ; 5. the comparison between the Chinese group and America group . The results of this study show: 1.the explained quantities of factor analysis are 62.49% to 68.20% andα are .88 to .94; 2. besides major central relationship pattern, there are minor patterns; 3. there are few informations in RAP to be analyzed; 4. convergent validity(.19-.62) and discriminant validity(.00-.10) are moderate; 5. CRQ is effective to differentiate between normal group and depression patients; 6. there is the culture discrepancy between Chinese group and America group. According to the above results of this study, the researcher proposes four suggestions: 1. we could enlarge sample by ages and occupations for application; 2. we could collect a large of Chinese culture items then makes CRQ to local culture; 3. there could be formulated a score standard to be more conformed to clinical application; 4. the qualitative analysis of RAP should be clear and definite for criterion.

並列關鍵字

central relationship pattern ； core conflictual relationship theme Method ； CCRT ； central relationship questionnaire ； CRQ ； inventory of interpersonal problems ； IIP ； relationship anecdotes paradigm interview ； RAP