本研究旨在探討兩種不同亞型的學習障礙學生在實施「報讀」之評量調整措施後,其社會學習領域考試成績是否有成效,其中這兩種亞型的學障生分別「識字型學習障礙」與「語文型學習障礙」。 研究方法採用單一受試實驗設計之交替處理設計(Alternating treatments design,簡稱ATD),自變項為「獨立」完成與提供「報讀」措施兩種作答情境之介入,依變項為社會學習領域之「記憶型題目」成績與「理解型題目」成績,了解不同亞型的學習障礙學生於介入後對這兩種不同認知層次的試題是否有成效。 研究對象為三名四年級學障生與兩名五年級學障生,研究資料分析採視覺分析法及效果值分析(d)。 本研究結果重點如下: 一、報讀介入對「識字型學習障礙」學生於社會學習領域成績有正向成效。 二、報讀介入對「語文型學習障礙」學生於社會學習領域成績有負向成效。 三、報讀介入對「識字型學習障礙」學生於社會學習領域之「理解型題目」比「記憶型題目」成績更有幅度的正向成效。 四、報讀介入對「語文型學習障礙」學生於社會學習領域之「理解型題目」比「記憶型題目」成績更有幅度的負向成效。 最後,研究者針對研究結果提出建議,以供特殊教育相關單位作參考。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of assessment accommodations on social learning field for two different subtypes students with learning disabilities. One of them was Literacy Learning Disabilities, the other one was Language Learning Disabilities. The alternating treatments design of the single subject experimental design was employed in this study. The independent variable is the intervention of oral reading test assistance, whereas the dependent is the performance of test items on the social learning field. The test items included memory questions and comprehension questions. Three fourth-grade and two fifth-grade students with learning disabilities were chosen as research subjects. The collected data was analyzed through effect size analysis. The results indicated that: 1.The intervention of oral reading test assistance has a positive effect on the Literacy Learning Disabilities. 2.The intervention of oral reading test assistance has a negative effect on the Language Learning Disabilities. 3.The intervention of oral reading test assistance has more positive effects on comprehension questions than memory questions for the Literacy Learning Disabilities. 4.The intervention of oral reading test assistance has more negative effects on comprehension questions than memory questions for the Language Learning Disabilities. Finally, the suggestions were made for the special education related units for reference.