在這研究,填充床和轉動的填充床模型的摘要確認了與實驗設備數據。PB模型確認了與Radfrac率根據模型亞斯本加上,並且在ACM平台的機構內部的PB模型,模仿結果顯示了好對應在兩模型。然而,質量傳遞交互作用模型應該小心地精選取決於包裝的種類。 Billet和Schultes (1999)模型很好展示與任意包裝,但是不在被構造的包裝的系統。然而,在Aspen加上和ACM展示開發的模型相當同樣模仿結果。對於Bravo (1985)和Hanley (2012),質量傳遞交互作用模型展示在被構造的包裝的系統的好結果和相當高在任意包裝系統。此外, RPB模型在ACM被開發了與假定以及在鉛模型,但是在另外幾何吸收體模型。 RPB結果展示了與實驗數據的令人滿意的結果。所以,在ACM的機構內部的模型在實驗設備標度顯示可靠的模仿結果。
In this research, the model of packed bed and rotating packed bed was validated with pilot plant data. The PB model was validated with Radfrac rate-based model on Aspen plus and in-house PB model on ACM platform, the simulation results showed good corresponding on both model. However, the mass transfer correlation model should be carefully select depends on the type of packing. With Billet and Schultes (1999) model demonstrate well with random packing but not in structured packing system. However, the model developed on Aspen plus and ACM show quite the same simulation results. For Bravo (1985) and Hanley (2012), mass transfer correlation model show the good result on structured packing system and quite higher in random packing system. Furthermore, RPB model was developed on ACM with an assumption as well as in PB model, but in different geometry absorber model. The RPB results demonstrated the satisfactory result with the experiment data. Therefore, the in-house model on ACM shows the reliable simulation result in the pilot plant scale.