遠距離戀愛進行式：成人依附風格、愛情維持行為與關係滿意度之相關研究

In Long-Distance Relationships: The Correlative Study of Adult's Attachment Styles, Relational Maintenance Behaviors, and Relationship Satisfaction.

林暐云(Wei-Yun Lin)

指導教授 ： 王振世

國立清華大學/竹師教育學院/教育心理與諮商學系/碩士(2018年)

摘要

摘要
本研究旨在了解遠距離戀愛者的成人依附風格、愛情維持行為及關係滿意度之現況與關係，及考驗遠距離戀愛者的成人依附風格、愛情維持行為對關係滿意度之預測。本研究以「基本資料」、「人際依附風格量表」、「愛情維持行為」與「關係滿意度量表」為測量工具，以正在經營遠距離戀愛者為對象，採用網路問卷調查，以立意抽樣及滾雪球抽樣方式，共收集741份有效問卷。並以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、多變量變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、多元迴歸分析考驗研究假設。本研究結果略述如下：
一、遠距離戀愛者之平均主觀知覺距離6.63分（1-10分量尺），平均物理距離3115.33公里，平均相聚約會時間6.6天，平均一次分離時間為11週，分離時平均不到一天就會透過任何方式與伴侶維繫。
二、遠距離戀愛者的成人依附風格傾向，以安全型與焦慮型傾向占最多。在關係中使用正向愛情維持行為傾向頗高，以給予建議與衝突管理使用傾向占最高。並且相較少使用負向愛情維持行為，其中以破壞性衝突使用傾向占最多。遠距離戀愛者知覺的整體關係滿意度偏高。
三、遠距離戀愛者的成人依附風格傾向在「見面頻率」，具顯著差異。
四、遠距離戀愛的愛情維持行為在「性別」、「總共交往時間」、「遠距離戀愛交往時間」，有明顯差異。
五、在遠距離戀愛者的關係滿意度中，「性別」、「見面頻率」、「總共交往時間」、「遠距離交往時間」、「主觀知覺距離」及「是否經營過遠距離戀愛」，並無明顯差異。
六、遠距離戀愛者的成人依附風格傾向與關係滿意度具顯著相關，除排除型依附傾向。
七、遠距離戀愛者的成人依附風格傾向與愛情維持行為具顯著相關。
八、遠距離戀愛者的正向愛情維持行為與關係滿意度具有正相關。而負向愛情維持行為與關係滿意度具有負相關，但刺探監聽則無顯著相關。
九、遠距離戀愛者之成人依附風格傾向與愛情維持行為對關係滿意度具有預測力，其中以「保證」的預測力最佳。
本研究根據研究結果，提供建議給遠距離戀人、輔導實務應用及未來研究之參考。

關鍵字：遠距離戀愛、成人依附風格、愛情維持行為、關係滿意度

關鍵字

遠距離戀愛 ； 成人依附風格 ； 愛情維持行為 ； 關係滿意度

並列摘要

Abstract
The purpose of the study was to explore the relationships among adult attachment styles, relational maintenance behaviors, and relationship satisfaction in long-distance relationship, and to examine if their relationship satisfaction could be predicted by their adult attachment styles and relational maintenance behaviors. Seven hundred and forty one people in long-distance relationship were recruited to fill out the questionnaires.
Research instruments included Personal Information, Attachment Style Scale (ASS), Relational Maintenance Behaviors Scale (RMBS), and Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS). Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, MANOVA, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis. The major findings were as follows:
1.In long-distance relationship, the average subjective perception distance was 6.63 points (1-10 points), the average physical distance was 3115.33km, the average dating time was 6.6 days, the average separation period was 11 weeks. On average, long-distance lovers would communicate with their partners less than 24 hours when they were in separated condition.
2.For the adult attachment in close relationship of the lovers, most of the subjects tended to be secure style and preoccupied style. They used more positive relational maintenance behaviors than negative ones in a romantic relationship, and they perceived higher relationship satisfaction.
3.In long-distance relationship, different dating frequency groups showed significant differences in adult attachment styles.
4.In long-distance relationship, three different background variables (gender, relationship duration, and long-distance relationship duration) showed significant differences in relational maintenance behaviors.
5.In long-distance relationship, different background variables (gender, dating frequency, relationship duration, long-distance relationship duration, and subjective perception of distance) showed no differences in relationship satisfaction.
6.In long-distance relationship, there were significant correlation between adult attachment styles and relationship satisfaction except dismissing style.
7.In long-distance relationship, there were significant correlation between adult attachment styles and relational maintenance behaviors.
8.In long-distance relationship, there were positive correlations between positive relational maintenance behaviors and relationship satisfaction, and negative correlations between negative relational maintenance behaviors and relationship satisfaction.
9.In long-distance relationship, adult attachment styles and relational maintenance behaviors could predict effectively relationship satisfaction. In all relational maintenance behaviors, assurance was the most powerful predictor.

According to the results, suggestions were provided to people in long-distance relationship, the counseling practitioners, and the future studies.

Key words: long-distance relationship, adult attachment styles, relational maintenance behaviors, relationship satisfaction

並列關鍵字

long-distance relationship ； adult attachment styles ； relational maintenance behaviors ； relationship satisfaction

參考文獻

王郁茗、王慶福（2007）。大學生知覺其人際依附風格對愛情關係適應之影響。教育心理學報，38（4），397-415。

李靜如、林邦傑、修慧蘭（2011）。成人依附、社交自我效能、困擾的自我揭露、寂寞與憂鬱之關係：以有戀愛經驗的大學生為例。教育心理學報，43（1），155-174。

張妤玥、陸洛（2007）。愛情關係中對方衝突管理方式與自身關係滿意度之關連。中華心理衛生學刊，20（2），155-178。

Anderson, T.L. & Emmers-Sommer, T.M. (2006). Predictors of relationship satisfaction in online romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 57(2), 153-172.DOI: 10.1080/10510970600666834.

Borelli, J.L., Rasmussen, H.F., Burkhart, M. L. & Sbarra, D.A. (2015). Relational savoring in long-distance romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(8), 1083–1108. DOI: 10.1177/0265407514558960.