- 學位論文
養殖漁業生產區公共給排水模式及其優選方法之研究
Study on the Public Water Supply and Drainage Model and Optimization of the Aquaculture Demonstraction Districts
摘要
中文摘要 台灣傳統的養殖魚塭沒有較完善的給排水系統，近年來由於台灣污染問題日益嚴重，漁民為了取得量足且質優的養殖用水，只好自設閘門及抽水設施取水，所以導致地層下陷；且因給排水共用同一水路，造成了魚病互相傳染等問題，為了解決這些問題，規劃設置養殖區完整的公共設施是必要的。 本研究為了公平、合理地分配42養殖區之建設順序，將42養殖區之給排水模式依面積大小、取水方式、輸水方式及配水方式予以分類，並根據農業工程研究中心「養殖漁業生產區公共設施規劃（1）42個養殖漁業生產區之水源供應方案及公共設施調查規劃」，對42養殖區做規劃後之總工程費，配合漁業署90年度養殖魚塭田間調查成果、42養殖區之平均存活率與收成時單尾重及84~89年主要養殖魚種之平均單價等資料，以益本比法對各養殖區做經濟分析，估算出年計成本、年計效益及益本比。 優選時為了同時考慮經濟效益與地區均衡發展，以益本比分析結果為基礎，分為台灣全區排序及各縣市排序，結果顯示，全區排序前15名的區域有高雄縣的新港區、永華區、永安區、彌陀區、屏東縣的塭豐區、番仔崙區、下埔頭區、大庄區、北勢寮區、雲林縣的新港北區、下崙南區、嘉義縣的東好美區、西新店區、台南縣的海埔區、保安區，益本比都在1.8以上，投資效益高，建議優先建設。而各縣市排序結果，宜蘭縣的壯圍區、彰化縣的永興區、雲林縣的新港北區、嘉義縣的東好美區、台南縣的海埔區、高雄縣的新港區、屏東縣的塭豐區及花蓮縣的壽豐區等，效益最好，值得優先考慮。
並列摘要
Abstract The transitional pools did not have more perfect water supply and drainage system. Recently, the pollution problem in Taiwan is more and more serious. Fishers were in order to take enough and good aquaculture water, so they sat gate and the facilities of pumping to get water by themselves. It resulted in layer depression. Because they used the same canal for water supply and drainage, it caused the problem of fish diseases infection to each other. In order to solve these problems, it is needed to plan and build complete public facilities in aquaculture district. This study is in order to allocate the building sequence of 42 aquaculture districts fairly and reasonably. Classifying 42 aquaculture districts by area, and taking water method, and water carrier method, and water supply method. According to the report of agricultural Engineering Research Center“Public facilities planning of Aquaculture Demonstration District (1)─water supply program, and public facilities investigating and projecting of 42 Aquaculture Demonstration Districts.”The total engineering cost of planning 42 aquaculture districts together with the results of field investigation collected by Fisheries Administration Council of Agriculture in 2001, and the average survival rate and one fish weight when harvesting and average unit price of main fingerling in 1995~2000 of 42 aquaculture districts. Use these data, analysis the economical benefit of 42 aquaculture districts by cost-benefit ratio method to estimate annual cost, annual benefit, and cost-benefit ratio. In order to consider both economical benefit and developing balance in every county when we are optimizating. Base on the results of cost-benefit ratio analysis, we can sort all districts in Taiwan and in every county in sequence. The first 15 sequences of 42 districts in Taiwan are Xin-gang district, Yong-hua district, Yong-an district, Mi-tuo district in Gao-xiong county, and Wen-feng district, Fan-zai-lun district, Xia-pu-tou district, Da-zhuang district, Bei-shi-liao district in Ping-dong county, and Xin-gang-bei district, Xia-lun-nan district in Yun-lin county, and Dong-hao-mei district, Xi-xin-dian district in Jia-yi county, and Hai-pu district, Bao-an district in Tai-nan county. These districts’s cost-benefit ratio are all up of 1.8. They have high benefit of investment, so we can build these districts first. The best aquaculture district in every county are Zhuang-wei district in Yi-lan county, and Yong-xing district in Zhang-hua county, and Xin-gang-bei district in Yun-lin county, and Dong-hao-mei district in Jia-yi county, and Hai-pu district in Tai-nan county, and Xin-gang district in Gao-xiong county, and Wen-feng district in Ping-dong county, and Shou-feng district in Hua-lian county. It is worth to build these districts first.