本研究利用Bacillus amyloliquefaciens α-amylase(BAA)及Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase(BLA)兩種a-amylase,觀察在不同之溫度下,BAA與BLA隨溫度變化其結構與活性變化之情形。實驗中利用圓極偏光光譜觀察二級結構的破壞情形;以螢光光譜觀察其內胺基酸tryptophan的暴露情形;以活性分析觀察活性破壞的情形,並求出BAA與BLA受熱失活過程中熱力學性質的變化。藉此我們可以觀察BAA與BLA受熱失活過程中之異同,並與加入變性劑變性的結果加以比較。另一方面,我們使用胍鹽酸使α-amylase展開變性,試圖藉由butyl-CM-sepharose協助BAA與BLA復性,來觀察此兩種α-amylase摺疊過程中的異同。 實驗結果發現BAA與BLA隨溫度上升,其結構與活性有逐漸被破壞之現象,且BLA之二級結構較BAA穩定。對BAA而言,其結構一旦被破壞,也會立刻喪失其活性,而BLA則是疏水區域先暴露,接著才是二級結構與活性破壞。而由熱力學性質所得之結果發現,BLA之三級結構回復速度較慢。 在復性實驗中,經由butyl-CM-sepharose的幫助,原本以直接稀釋法,需在濃度降至0.003 mg/mL以下才能復性的BAA,已能在濃度0.56 mg/mL下獲得70%的活性回收,而以直接稀釋法無法復性的BLA,也能在濃度0.45 mg/mL下,回收38%的活性。 經比較BAA與BLA之復性結果發現butyl-CM-sepharose僅幫助BAA及BLA部分摺疊,而部分摺疊的蛋白質仍會產生糾結。BLA的質量與活性回收率均低於BAA。由BAA與BLA受熱失活的結論得知,BLA復性結果較不理想的原因應為BLA的三級結構回復速度較慢所導致。
The main purpose of this study is to study how the secondary and tertiary structure changes relate to the protein stability and refolding. The unfolding and refolding processes of two a-amylases derived from Bacillus licheniformis (BLA) and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (BAA) were investigated and compared. The thermal stability of a-amylase was monitored by the loss of its secondary structure and tertiary structure, as well as the activity loss. The loss of (a-helix was chosen to represent the secondary structure change and was monitored under circular dichroism. The percentage of (a-helix loss at various temperatures could be estimated. The tertiary structure was symbolized by the exposure of a hydrophobic amino acid, tryptophan, and could be monitored by the fluorescence spectroscopy. The kinetics and the thermodynamics of the disruption of a-amylase’s secondary and tertiary structure could therefore be monitored. It was found that, for either BAA or BLA, the destruction of the secondary structure proceeded in a rate similar to that of activity loss. However, the destruction of the secondary structure of BLA proceeded in a rate much slower than that of its tertiary structure. The results indicated that the activity stability of a-amylases depend more on the stability of their secondary structure than their tertiary structure and the superior thermal stability of BLA origins from its stronger secondary structure. Both a-amylases were not refolded by direct dilution at a final concentration larger than 0.003 mg/mL. By the assistance of a self-synthesized Butyl-CM-sepharose particle, the activity recovery of BAA reached 70% at a final concentration of 0.56 mg/mL and the activity recovery of BLA reached 38% at a concentration of 0.45 mg/mL. It was suspected that both a-amylases were only partially refolded on Butyl-CM-sepharose. The further refolding of BLA was slower than that of BAA so that the activity recovery of BLA was lower.