- 學位論文
專利法之損害賠償-以日本平成修法沿革為中心-
A Study of Damages for Patent Infringement -A Closer Look at Japan’s Heisei Amendment to Patent Law-
摘要
中文摘要 隨著知識經濟時代的來臨，企業競爭的利器與關鍵著重在技術與創新，無形資產的重要性已逐漸凌駕傳統有形資產之上，成為企業整體資產的主要構成部分，也是企業競爭力的主要核心，隨此種情況而衍生的，是企業間各種智慧財產權的爭訟與損害賠償的請求。因此，在社會和政府不斷呼籲，發展知識經濟，鼓勵創新，刺激進步的同時，我們是否也應思索，針對於各種人類知識和智慧結晶的保護，在法律制度上，我國是否已經提供給專利權人其所擁有權利適切的保護，和充足的救濟管道。 本論文的研究方向，即是希望針對傳統學說上在專利權之損害賠償上所可能面臨的問題提出歸納和整理；一方面在專利法修法後，我國法院針對智慧財產權損害賠償的相關判決，是否真的能保護到智慧財產權人之權利，法院針對賠償金的相關判決是否真能符合社會大眾和專利權人之期待，充分填補專利權人所受之損害。而對於各種違法侵害權利人專利權的情事，我國損害賠償制度是否真能達到所謂抑制侵害行為發生之作用。另一方面，學生也希望能以日本特許法，相關法律制度做為借鏡。因為，在智慧財產權的相關領域內及工業技術上，日本技術力的卓越是世界上數一數二，就這麼一個重視科技研發和創新的國家，其對於智慧財產權的保護，在相關法律制度內，應有我們值得學習的地方。而日本從昭和34年（西元1959年）至平成10年（西元1998年），在特許法上，針對損害賠償額此一議題共做了二次的法律修正，本文希望能針對日本法這幾次修法過程的沿革發展，能做一個介紹。並與我國現行法律規定和施行情形做一對比分析。以期取日本法之長處，補我國法不足之處。
並列摘要
Abstract With the arrival of the knowledge-based economy era, the efficient instruments and keys of enterprise's competition focus on technology and innovation. The importance of tangible assets has already been taken placed by the intangible assets gradually. Technology and innovation become the main cores of enterprise's competitiveness and they also turn into the main component part of whole assets of an enterprise. Derived from the above-mentioned situation, different technology firms settled various lawsuits against each other and apply damages for intellectual property infringement. So, in the meantime when the government constantly appealing to develop the knowledge economy and encouraging innovation to contribute to progress in the society, whether our country has already offered its appropriate protection to the patentee should be taken into consideration . And we should also think deeply whether the protection of various kinds of human knowledge and intellectual property granted by ROC patent law is sufficient or not. The research direction of this thesis wants to figure out the problems of damages for intellectual property infringement at traditional theory and to sum up them. On the other hand, after the adjustments of ROC patent law, does the judgment of our country’s court on compensation for intellectual property damage protect the patentee? Would the judgment of the court accord with the expectancy of people in the society and the patentee? And does the compensation really fill up the patentee’s loss? Besides, regarding to each kind of illegal violation of patent right, whether the damage compensation system in our country can achieve the function of decreasing violation behavior. On the one hand, this thesis hopes to follow the legislation of Japanese patent law, because in the relevant fields of intellectual property and industrial technology, brilliance of Japanese technological ability is one of the best in the world. Since Japan pays large attention to science research, technology development and innovation, its protection of the intellectual property in relative legal systems should be places where we deserve study. Japan from 1959 to 1998, has altogether made two times of legal revision in view of calculation of patent damages. This thesis wants to introduce Japanese revision in those years to our society. Then with the compare of the ROC patent law to patent legislation and implementation of Japan, thereby provides perhaps a better design of our patent law in following the Japanese legislation.