透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.103.202
  • 學位論文

宜蘭縣歷史空間保育發展之研究

Teh Study of Yi-Lan County Historical Area Conservation Development

指導教授 : 薛琴 喻肇青

摘要


自1981(民國70)年以降,宜蘭縣民開啟了長達24年「非國民黨執政」的綠色時代,這期間歷經陳定南、游錫堃、劉守成等三位縣長不同風格的掌政,彼此都在默守衣缽傳承,共同打造「宜蘭經驗」與「綠色奇蹟」的瑰麗政績。其中尤以文化治理的成果光環,頗獲各界讚譽歌頌與高度肯定。此間,筆者曾經參與多起文化建設的構思與建言,每每感觸到歷史空間的保育事業並未結合文化活動的熱烈展開而隨之起舞。因此,本論文的撰述重點,即想另闢蹊徑,藉著理念的闡揚,再參酌筆者參與保育行動的實務經驗而舖陳本研究的論述脈絡為: - 本研究開章名義即將「歷史空間」與「共生保育」的命題開釋,定位為闡述本論文的核心價值,並透過爭論的舉發,特別提到號稱民主聖地-嘉義市與宜蘭縣在執行歷史空間保育事件中所透露的保育問題,並藉由癥結的剖析,資以彰顯「歷史空間」與「共生保育」兩者理念適宜相嵌運用的合理性。 - 回顧蘭邑歷史空間保育發展脈絡,上溯清治時代,下迄綠色執政時代。期間,每個階段都會各自推出不同策略的保育方式,其中又以日治時代與「文化立縣」時期的保育行動深具影響力,堪稱為蘭陽歷史空間保育發展史上的頂真時代。 - 頃接本研究再假案例的探赜與評析,然後檢視宜蘭縣歷史空間的保育困境,又透過保育行動的試鍊而提出因應對策,並揆諸兩大向度的啟示:一是文化保育觀念的培育;另是文化保育情境的營造。如是,從而期待歷史空間保育事業的擴展能夠深化基層,形塑一段「由下而上」與「在地力量共同參與」的保育風潮。

並列摘要


From 1981, Yi-Lan county has been through the interior administration of the opposition party for 24 years. There were three praefects who had different regnal style but had one thing in common and attained to a highly reputation. That is the conduction of Yi-Lan county area couture. During those time, the author participated manys of discussion and gradualy started to build up sort of ideas which combined with practical experience and now are listed in follow : - Reserching in the definition of "Historical Area" and "Commensal Conservation". Through several dispute of problems of conservation happened in Yi-Lan and Ja-Yi county, we could realize the rationality that the ideas of "Historical Area" and "Commensal Conservation" works well together. - Retracing the conservation development of historical area in Yi-Lan county, from the time of Ching dynasty to the time of the opposition party mentioned before (also called DPP), each step had differential strategies. Especially in the time of under administration of Japan government and during the period of Yi-Lan cultural prosperity advanced by DPP, the conservation development had boost to a huge success. - Discussing the case of the mire of conservation of historical area in Yi-Lan county recently, here comes new strategies within practical move and giving inspiration in two ways: the one is the education of the conception of historical area conservation, the other is building of the condition of historical area conservation. Therefore we are able to expect the development of historical area conservation will extend to everyone's participation and become a trend from the bottom of everyone's heart.

並列關鍵字

historical area conservation culture Yi-Lan

參考文獻


余兆波,1952,《宜蘭新治》。宜蘭:宜蘭新治編輯委員會。
高諸觀,1955,《宜蘭全鑑》。宜蘭:宜蘭全鑑編輯委員會。
黃聲遠建築師事務所,1997,《楊士芳紀念公園工程設置規劃報告書》。宜蘭:宜蘭
會》。台南:國立文化資產保存研究中心籌備處。未出版。
胡興華,2002,《海洋台灣》。台北:行政院農業委員會漁業署。

被引用紀錄


陳貞玲(2015)。宜蘭文化資源和土地認同之探討〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2015.00246
鄔廸嘉(2015)。以委託代理人模型探討空間文化資產:以金門為例〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.00781
顏鈺亭 (2011). 「文化立縣」下的地方歷史書寫─以《宜蘭文獻雜誌》為中心(1993-2005) [master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315205726
莊秀冠(2012)。人與歷史交會之所--「文化立縣」與宜蘭縣史館(1992-2005)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315314389

延伸閱讀