安樂死合法化適宜性之研究

安樂死是 21 世紀最具爭議之人權問題，其目的在於確定人是否有選擇死亡的權利及國家是否有義務協助人民執行安樂死。如：支持它的人認為人之生命已不再是家族、社會、國家之附屬品，而是掌握在自己手上，故人有選擇死亡的自由，認為反對安樂死人士是守舊、不懂人間疾苦的老古董；而反對安樂死人士認為生命不可重來、人死無法復活，生命為人最重要的寶物之一，不應輕易地捨棄，且幾乎所有宗教、傳統觀念皆告訴我們生命之可貴，人不應有選擇死亡的權利。為了更了解安樂死以判斷安樂死是否值得合法化，本文先就安樂死相關之概念開始介紹，使大家對安樂死有基本的認識；接下來介紹宗教界對安樂死之態度；安樂死議題在各國引起之論戰及完成安樂死合法化之國家如何排除層層阻礙而使安樂死合法化；最後再討論安樂死涉及生死抉擇問題；現實的困境及我國實施安樂死之建議與契機以使讀者將安樂死相關議題與現實困境、契機結合，形成自己獨到、最適合自己的安樂死之看法。以便於未來可得預見之安樂死直球對決中依照自己願望而選擇自己所想，而非被媒體、網路上一堆似是而非的消息蒙蔽自己的雙眼而做出違背自己想法之選擇。

關鍵字

安樂死合法化；失智；尊嚴善終法

並列摘要

Euthanasia is the most controversial human rights issue in the 21st century. Its purpose is to determine whether people have the right to choose death and the state has an obligation to assist people in performing euthanasia. For example, those who support it believe that human life is not an attachment of family, society, and the country, but is in their own hands. Therefore, people have the freedom to choose death. Those who oppose euthanasia are old-fashioned antiquities who don’t understand human suffering. People who do not support euthanasia believe that life cannot be revived and death cannot be resurrected. Life is one of the most important treasures of human beings and should not be easily abandoned. Moreover, almost all religions and traditional concepts tell us that life is precious, so people should not Have the right to choose death. In order to better understand euthanasia and determine which is more suitable for the needs of modern people, this article first introduces the concepts related to euthanasia, so that everyone has a basic understanding of euthanasia, and then introduces the views of euthanasia in the religious world in order; The issue of euthanasia has caused controversy in various countries and how countries that have completed the legalization of euthanasia can remove all obstacles and legalize euthanasia; Finally, we will discuss the issue of euthanasia involving life and death choices. Realistic Dilemma, Suggestions and Opportunities for Euthanasia in Our Country those enable readers to combine issues related to euthanasia with realistic dilemmas and opportunities to form their own unique and most suitable views on euthanasia. So that you can choose what you want in the foreseeable euthanasia straight ball matchup according to your own wishes, instead of being blinded by the media and a bunch of specious news on the Internet and making a choice that goes against your own ideas.