透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.104.238
  • 學位論文

形象的「表現」概念-高達美《真理與方法》藝術詮釋學研究

The “Performance” Concept of Image – Gadamer’s "Truth and Method" Art-hermeneutic research

指導教授 : 陸敬忠

摘要


理解為高達美哲學詮釋學所主張之核心觀念。事理以各種歷史流傳物為媒體,迎向各世代的人。與事理照面,並尋求理解是精神運作的本能,在遊戲的過程中,事理透過其得以向人性存有者呈現之形象而被開顯,真理得以生發。藝術作品即是媒介或承載事理的形象,藝術經驗是生活中最可直接或無礙地接觸事理之經驗,然而受科學知識論意識影響,審美意識理論成為藝術史中理解藝術作品的重要方法。高達美藉藝術作品的表現概念,對審美意識作出批判,除了捍衛藝術作品本身真理呈顯的主權,也間接揭示精神科學對真理認識的概念。從此一經驗出發,透過對各種經典文物進行探究,遂可進入與整個詮釋學經驗相適應的認識真理之途。本文主要探討形象的存有與表現,藉高達美《真理與方法》第一部份「藝術經驗裏真理問題的展現」第二段「藝術作品的存有學及其詮釋學的意義」之文本,以〈形象的存有學意義〉段落深入分析形象的表現概念,透過與其他學者有關藝術理念之對比,詮釋高達美「形象存有學」中所要表達藝術存有之適合表現方式。

關鍵字

代表 表現 教化 遊戲 摹本 原形 形象 流射 轉化 構成物

並列摘要


Understanding as core-idea is advocated by Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics. “Sache”( matter-of-fact ) uses all kind of historical tradition as medium and bands down to all generations of people. Face to face with “Sache” and seek to understand it is the Instinct of spiritual activity, In the course of the game, “Sache” is disclosure, through the image, which performs to human being, Truth will be happening. Works of art mediate and bear the image of “Sache”. Art experience is the most directly and unhindered accessible way to experience “Sache” in our life. However, affected by the consciousness of the epistemology of scientific, the epistemology theory of aesthetic consciousness becomes an important method of understanding works of art in the history of art. Gadamer’s emphasizing on the concept of the performance of art works and critiques on aesthetic consciousness have both defend the sovereignty of the truth through the works of art itself and show indirectly reveal the concept of truth of Spiritual science. Starts from this experience, through the exploration of various classical heritages, we can come into the way of truth which corresponds with the whole hermeneutical experiences. This thesis mainly focuses on the existent and presentation of the image. Based on the Gadamer’s text in Truth and Method, the first part of "The question of truth as it emerges in the experience of art," the paragraph of "The ontology of the work of art and its hermeneutic significance," and the paragraph of “The ontological valence of the picture”, and the ideas of art of other scholars, a decent interpretative analysis of the performance of image has been conducted to interpret what Gadamer’s right way to express the Being of art in his “Ontology of image”.

參考文獻


花亦芬,<宗教圖像爭議與路德教派文化政策-以紐倫堡接受宗教改革過程為中心的考察>,於《臺大文史哲學報》,第七十期,臺北:臺灣大學文學院,2009年5月,頁 179~229。
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,《精神現象學》賀麟譯,仰哲,民國78年出版。
Heidegger, Martin,《林中路》,孫周興譯,上海藝文,2004年7月1版一刷。
Johann Joachim Winckelmann,《希臘美術模仿論》,潘襎在翻譯箋著,典藏藝術家庭,2006年11月出版。
Johann Joachim Winckelmann,《希臘人的藝術》,邵大箴譯,廣西師大,2001年10月出版。

被引用紀錄


何藴芳、謝玲玲、李秉穎、邱達維、唐筠雯、黃彥銘、陳瓊雪(2018)。專業素養與藥學教材建構台灣醫學22(4),351-360。https://doi.org/10.6320/FJM.201807_22(4).0001

延伸閱讀