透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.59.243.194
  • 學位論文

政府採購法決標程序之研究

A Study on the Contract Awarding Procedure of Government Procurement Act

指導教授 : 姚志明

摘要


政府各機關於營繕工程、購置訂製財務及勞務等業務,於專門法規制定前,皆係依據多項行政規則為其採購行政作業之主要規範。惟政府採購制度之良窳,影響公共工程品質最切,政府為求國內公共工程之完善,建立一完整政府採購制度更形迫切與重要。政府採購法於民國87年5月27日施行,其中除維持最低標之得標原則外,並創設最有利標及複數決標之決標制度。 有別於傳統之最低標決標,最有利標並非以價格之因素為唯一考量,是強調廠商技術、財力、信譽、管理、預算、履約等條件,需經由評選審核作業通過,並獲評審會多數決議後,取得執行合約。但,評選作業規定、過程與結果之公正性亦頗受外界質疑。工程會爰自95年起已採取多項改革措施。 本文自決標之法制沿革開始論述,盼使讀者瞭解本文之根基,後續決標之實務程序就政府採購過程之作業順序臚列簡介,以文獻探討研究方式,就近年來的案例進行探討,並就決標程序之內容與相關問題點出,從理論面逐步推進至實務面,期給予讀者更為清晰之政府採購決標程序之樣貌,就後續可行性之作為,於本文之末提出作者之結論,期使實務問題得到解決方案。

並列摘要


Before special laws and regulations are legislated, government agencies of engineering and operation maintenance, purchasing custom finance, labor and other services, accord multi administrative rules as its procurement of the main norms of administrative operations. However, the corrupted government procurement system affected the quality of public constructions. In order to improve the domestic public constructions, it is more urgent and important for the government to establish a complete government procurement system. The Government Procurement Law came into effect on May 27, 1998. In addition to maintaining the principle of awarding with the lowest bid, the government also established more awarding systems, such as the most advantageous bid and the multiple award bid. Different from the traditional minimum standard, the most advantageous bid is not the only consideration of the price factor, instead, it emphasizes the manufacturer's technology, financial resources, credit, management, budget, performance and other conditions, which were subjected to the selection and approval process and passed the review meeting. After the majority of the resolution, the government obtained the implementation of the contract. However, the fairness of the operation, process and the results of the selection of operating rules called into questions by the outsiders. Since 2006, the engineering committee has taken a number of reforming measures. This context has begun discoursing from the jural evolution, hoping that readers can understand the basic principles. We will set out the government procurement process of job order profile of the follow-up standard procedures by the means of literature research methods to explore the case in recent years. We will discuss the relate issues, point out the theoretical side and gradually promote the practices. Hope that we can show more clear side of the government procurement bidding procedures to the readers. As for the follow-up feasibility, I’ll bring my own conclusions in the end of the paragraph. Anticipating that Practical problems will be resolved.

參考文獻


4. 王國武、林惠燦,最有利標採訂定底價之探討,營建知訊,第258期,2004年7月,第65頁-第71頁。
5. 王國武、余文德,工程異質採購分析模式之研究,中國土木水利工程學刊,第23卷,第1期,2011年,第77頁-第91頁。
11. 林樹埔,論政府採購行為之定性及申訴審議費用之徵收,法令月刊,第64卷,第1期,2013 年1月。第83頁-第95頁。
17. 陳君漢,論決標與行政處分之屬性(上),營建知訊,第295期,2007年8月。第59頁-第68頁。
18. 陳君漢,論決標與行政處分之屬性(下),營建知訊,第296期,2007年9月。第67頁-第71頁。

延伸閱讀