透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.190.217.134
  • 學位論文

不同設計類型之人工頸椎間盤之有限元素分析

Finite Element Analysis of Different Design Types of Artificial Cervical Disc

指導教授 : 陳文斌
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


並列摘要


Interbody fusion is often a major surgical treatment for intervertebral degeneration and instability. During the treatment, vertebrae are fused together using an interbody fusion device. Such fusion treatment intend to protect spine and relieve nerve pains. However, this treatment may lack mobility of cervical spine, and increase the disc stresses at adjacent levels. Nonfusion is a relatively new surgical treatment procedure, and the major implant for the nonfusion surgery is artificial disc. Instead of spinal fusion has been used to protect the spine from the excessive changes in mechanical stress. The object of this study was to use a computational finite element method to generate the cervical spine model from the digitized CT scans, and to use using different motion design types of artificial disc. It was applied a preload of 73.6N and 1Nm moment in flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation to investigate the range of motion (ROM), disc stresses at the adjacent level, the center of rotation (COR) of the vertebral body, and the effect on the range of motion after insertion of the artificial disc with and without annulus fibers. Besides, we divided three design types of the artificial disc in this study: TypeⅠ- ball-and-socket type device; TypeⅡ- large radius bearing surface device; TypeⅢ- bi-articulating unconstrained device. The range of motion was not significantly different for the intact and disc replacement groups with annulus fibers under flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. However, the range of motion of disc replacement groups without annulus fibers was significantly higher than that of the intact model. Besides, the range of motion gives a good account of the insertion of TypeⅡ group in axial rotation, and the range of motion with the insertion of TypeⅢ group was similar to that of the intact model. The center of rotation area of the intact model was found smaller than that of the artificial disc insertion model. Consequently, the intact model is the steadiest motion situation than the three model with artificial cervical disc groups.

參考文獻


[1] Anderson P.A., Rouleau J.P., 2004. Intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Spine 29(23), 2779–2786.
[2] Anderson P.A., Sasso R.C., Rouleau J.P., 2004. The Bryan cervical disc: wear properties and early clinical results. Journal Spine 4(6 Suppl), 303S–309S.
[3] DiAngelo D.J., Roberston J.T., Metcalf N.H., 2003. Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 16(4), 314–323.
[4] Goel V.K., Clausen J.D., 1998. Prediction of load sharing among spinal components of a C5-C6 motion segment using the finite element approach. Spine 23(6), 684–691.
[5] Smith H.E., Wimberley D.W., Vaccaro A.R., 2004. Cervical arthroplasty: material properties. Neurosurg Focus 17(3), E3.

延伸閱讀