- 學位論文
從方法到真 —牟宗三《圓善論》對基督判教之研究
From Method to Truth ─ A Study of Mou Zong-san's Panjiao System toward Christianity in Treatise on the Summum Bonum
摘要
本論文主要是處理牟先生《圓善論》中的基督判教「如何而可能」的問題。「如何而可能」涉及了哲學方法的建構與論證，基督判教則涉及到牟先生對基督教的價值判斷(人格化的上帝一概念之形成之虛幻性)。本論文因而設想牟先生在《圓善論》中有其對圓善的意識、思想、論證等哲學討論的架構，這些架構涉及到牟先生對儒家「圓善」的真理認知模式。因此，本論文分別從《圓善論》的意識方法、思想方法、論證方法等進路開始進行分析：意識方法以天台宗的判教以圓教的教內之判分析為主、思想方法以文獻比對與義理參照的對應式哲學詮釋分析為主、論證方法以牟先生論康德的善與圓滿的善與其所可能條件分析為主。最後，再針對牟先生批判/轉化康德哲學的道德形上學與康德的道德神學的基督教思維所對應的兩種真理特質與認知模式，提出牟宗三基督判教仍有值得商榷之處。 附
並列摘要
This purpose of of the thease is for how Panjiao System toward Christianity in Treatise on the Summum Bonum is possible in Mou Zong-san's Moral meta-phylosophy. It is about the method. The approch of method is including the framement of conciounseness, theory and argugement. They are also involved with how Mou to critize Kant's Moral Phylosophy for creating his Summum Bonum in Chinese traditional phylosophy way. Mou's unique comprehence of the Summum Bonum in Chinese traditional phylosophy way affects his prejuice and judgement on Christianity.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 林志欽（2013）。天台智顗著作中之圓教法門分析與彙整。淡江中文學報，(29)，79-108。https://doi.org/10.6187/tkujcl.201306.29-4
- 沈鴻慎（2019）。從「化儀」之教衡定近溪「覺悟」之中蘊含的儒家圓教問題－以牟宗三先生的疏解為基礎。鵝湖學誌，(63)，63-105。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10213732-201912-202007030023-202007030023-63-105
- 吳忠偉（2017）。從「無體用的體用論」到「詭譎的圓善」－論牟宗三「天台圓教」說形態之演化。鵝湖月刊，(508)，11-19。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18133738-201710-201711300008-201711300008-11-19
- 杨剑龙（2017）。The Present Situation & Thinking on the Relationship Researches of Christian Culture & Chinese Contemporary Literature。聖經文學研究，()，264-288。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20181218001-201704-202204180019-202204180019-264-288
- 沈清松（2014）。The Starting Point of Metaphysics: Transcendental Thomism and Chinese Philosophy。哲學與文化，41(9)，3-23。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10158383-201409-201410220056-201410220056-3-23