摘要 本研究希望透過建廠工程專案管理相關文獻資料之分析整理,並以中國重慶工業園區企業為實例,彙整出建廠工程專案管理導入關鍵成功因素,並以層級程序分析法建立起權重架構。經過本研究的調查發現,歸納出以下幾點結論: 一、海外建廠工程專案管理系統導入關鍵成功因素評估指標架構 共計有「投資地區政府招商政策」、「建廠工程人員面」、「建廠工程成本面」、「建廠工程系統面」、「建廠工程品質面」等五大構面及20個評估指標。 二、海外建廠工程專案管理系統導入關鍵成功因素評估指標的權重。 構面部份,依序排列分別是投資地區政府招商政策構面,排序1,建廠工程成本面構面排序2,建廠工程品質面構面排序3,建廠工程人員面構面排序4,建廠工程系統面構面排序5。 指標部份前十名者,依序排列分別是購地優惠政策,整體排序1;充份勞工人力,整體排序2;稅務優惠政策,整體排序3;系統能順利及時移交使用單位,整體排序4;公共設施完備,整體排序5;嚴格審核供應商施工能力,整體排序6;專案管理小組組織架構與運作模式良好,整體排序7;建置成本低於預算及符合規範,整體排序8;成員具備建廠工程專業能力,整體排序9;建置成本控制在預算合理範圍,整體排序10。 本研究的實務貢獻為提供海外建廠工程專案管理系統導入關鍵成功因素在評估導入成效時可行之評分表,以節省無形的時間、人力及有形之金錢成本。從研究結果可以看出,投資地區政府招商政策方面的因素遠高於建廠工程人員面、建廠工程系統面、建廠工程品質面等因素,並不是代表上述因素是不重要的,而是必需將其視為必要的基礎的,故可作為重要的評估要項,此為重要的參考資訊。
Abstract This study takes the enterprises of Industrial Park in Chongqing, China as the sample through collate relevant literature to analysis , a collection of initiating project management for construction to analyze critical success factors, and analytic hierarchy process to establish weights architecture. After investigation, the study summed up the following conclusions: 1. The critical success factors evaluation index structure of initiating factories for project management for construction A total of five dimension with "Investment regional government investment policy", " engineers dimension", "construction cost dimension", "construction system dimension", "construction quality dimension " and 20 indicators. 2. The weight for the critical success factors evaluation index structure of initiating factories for project management for construction The weight for the dimension , sequentially are "Investment regional government investment policy" with first order, "construction cost dimension" with ranking 2, "construction quality dimension " with ranking 3 , " engineers dimension" with ranking 4, , "construction system dimension" with ranking 5. The top ten weight for the indicators , sequentially are the purchase order to the preferential policies were, with the overall ranking 1; fully human labor, with the overall ranking 2; tax incentives, with the overall ranking 3 ; system can successfully and timely transfer of the use of units, with the overall ranking 4; public facilities, with the overall ranking 5; rigorous audit providers construction capacity, with the overall ranking 6; project management team organizational structure and mode of operation is good, with the overall ranking 7; build below budget and meet the criteria, with the overall ranking 8; members have plant engineering expertise, with the overall ranking 9; build cost control in reasonable budget, with the overall ranking 10. The contribution of this study is to provide the overseas plant engineering project management system to import to import the key success factors in evaluating the effectiveness of the score sheet when feasible, invisible to save time, manpower and tangible monetary cost. As can be seen from the results, the factors of investment policy in local government investment is much higher than plant engineers face, face plant engineering systems, plant engineering quality of surface and other factors, not on behalf of the above factors are unimportant, but necessary to be regarded as the necessary basis, it can be assessed as an important item, this is an important reference information.