Using the S&P 1500non-financial firms over the period 2004 to 2012, this study examines the impacts of managerial overconfidence on corporate risk management, including hedging willingness and hedging extent. The results indicate that firms with overconfident CEO or CFO have significant lower incentive to hedge and hedging extent. When testing the impact of overconfident Chief Executive Officer (CEO) andChief Financial Officer (CFO) simultaneously, we find overconfident CEO have more influence on the incentive to hedge than overconfident CFO, but overconfident CFO play the more important role in hedging extent than overconfident CEO.