In the traditional literature on signaling, an incumbent firm may signal its product quality to consumers via a high price or signal its cost to potential entrants via limit pricing. Due to the signaling cost, the incumbent always obtains a lower profit compared to the profit level under complete information. In this paper, we consider a duopoly market in which one of the incumbent firms uses limit pricing to prevent a potential entrant from entering the market. We investigate whether the signaling firm can earn a higher profit than under complete information. Moreover, we characterize the necessary and sufficient conditions of the separating equilibria in different settings of models. We find that, under certain conditions, the signaling firm may obtain a higher profit than under the complete information.