從三種政策調控理論探析台灣廉政政策－以推動「法務部廉政局」為論述重點

本文為台灣廉政政策調控之研究，並以政府現階段推動成立法務部廉政局之實務個案為論述重點，嘗試以德國當代「他我直接調控」、「他我間接調控」及「自我調控」等三種政策調控理論之模式與意涵，一方面以理論觀察實務，另一方面以實務檢驗理論，兩者交互論證。研究後發現，政府推動成立廉政局之調控政策基本上是一種他我直接調控構想，已不適合於台灣的多元社會，也因此導致實務上諸多困境，值得政府深切反省；而這些困境可藉由自我調控理論的相關論述得到充分的解釋，顯示該理論是一種理論模型的超越，但因自我調控理論將偶變與吊詭等不確定因素的論述推向極致，在實務運用上，有過度偏向消極、悲觀之嫌，因此目前政策調控實務上仍多偏重於他我間接調控理論的構想與設計；儘管如此，自我調控理論強調權變的相關論述，仍然深具實務上的參考價值。

關鍵字

政策調控、行動理論、系統理論、自我再製系統、偶變、吊詭

並列摘要

This research aims to study the Policy-Steering of Anti-corruption in Taiwan. It will mainly focus on the case of promoting Anti-corruption Burear,MOJ from views of three theories of: “Subject-Object Direct Policy-Ssteering Theory”、 “Subject-Object Indirect Policy-Ssteering Theory”、 “Autopoiesis Policy-Ssteering Theory”. Furthermore, this research will examine the case by using these theories, and also verify these theories while examing the case. According to this research, the case of promoting Anti-corruption Burear, MOJ in Taiwan is based on the theory of Subject-Object Direct Policy-Ssteering, which is not suitable for the diverse Taiwan society anymore. This unsuitable theory causes many problems in carrying out the policy; moreover, it also proves Auto Policy-Ssteering Theory as a transcendant form among the theories. However, Autopoiesis Policy-Ssteering Theory takes a negative attitude toward policies because it emphasizes too much on paradoxical and uncertain factors. Therefore, while Auto Policy-Ssteering Theory and related theories about “contingency”worth us consulting, Subject-Object Indirect Policy-Ssteering Theory is still the dominant theory used in Taiwan society.