澎湖地區受保護管束少年逃家經驗敘事研究

本研究旨在探討澎湖地區受保護管束少年的逃家經驗，包含探討其採取逃家行為之處境、逃家後的生活經驗以及其對逃家經驗的理解。本研究採用質性研究中的敘事研究，共訪談三位澎湖地區受保護管束少年，並將訪談內容透過敘事分析的歸類-內容分析法，採跨個案方式進行綜合分析與討論。綜合資料歸納分析與訪談資料，研究發現如下：首先，澎湖地區受保護管束少年採取逃家行為的處境分為與環境互動之生活體驗及與逃家情境互動之主觀經驗。在與環境互動之生活體驗包含有家內生活處境呈現令其難以忍受的家庭氣氛、其因應家庭失控的方式有限以及受到貧困弱勢的家庭社經地位影響；家外的生活處境顯示其與社區間的人際互動關係、在校的適應狀況與就業狀態成為促使其逃家的引力與阻力。而與逃家情境互動之主觀經驗分為初次逃家情境與個人認知、後續逃家情境與個人認知以及與逃家情境相關之情緒因應討論。其次，有關澎湖地區受保護管束少年於逃家後的生活經驗，依其為初次逃家與後續逃家經驗而有不同的轉變。初次逃家時多以同社區友伴為支持來源、逃家後所感受到「不在家中」的心情普遍為負面的感受、而家人對初次逃家行為的反應也影響其後來的逃家意願。後續的逃家主要受到與家庭間的互動負面感受依舊持續影響，而逃家後除了仍仰賴同儕友伴的協助，也有因社工介入而多增加支持資源；後續逃家經驗反應在與學校以及社區間的人際互動更為負向；歷經數次逃家的少年，其與家人間的互動關係也漸進轉變，當正向的認知調整多於負向的感受即強化其「在家」的意願。至於澎湖地區受保護管束少年對逃家經驗的理解則分別為逃家經驗的正負向影響以及其對逃家行為的建議加以整理說明。最後，研究者根據研究結果加以討論，並針對家長、實務工作者以及未來的研究提出建議。

關鍵字

澎湖地區；保護管束少年；逃家經驗；敘事分析

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to explore the runaway from home experience of juvenility under the probation system in Penghu area. Issues including in which they described their experience with, and understanding of, runaway from home were investigated. This research invited three juvenility under the probation system in Penghu area and collected the data through narrative analysis interview. Using categorical-content analysis to integrate and discuss individually. The main findings were as below: First, the situation induced participants’ runaway from home included personal-environment interaction and their subjective experience associated with runaway episodes. Personal-environment interaction included the inner-home states and the outer-home states. The inner-home states included participants’ vulnerability to the unbearable family conditions, having limited resources to cope with family problems and suffering with poor family status. The outer-home states included participants’ relationship with the community, adaptability to schools and employment status that prevented and eroded their runaway from home. The subjective experience associated with runaway episodes contained the first-time and repeated runaway episodes recognized and participants’ emotional problems related to runaway episodes. Besides, the first-time runaway from home experience was different from the repeated one. The content of first-time runaway from home experience encompassed: Friends provided help, participants suffered from a range of emotional problems, and feedback of their family affected their will of recidivism. And endurance of poor family coping, educational detachment, and other deviant behaviors represented the impoverishment with social institutions as recidivism. However, the intervention of service providers and the more positive reflections on the relationship in which participants try to readjust interpersonal and family connection could strengthen their will of being at home. Additionally, cautions were given upon reflections on their conduct. Finally, based on the research findings above, the discussion was presented in attempt to make suggestions to parents, service providers and future research.