本研究的範圍選定台灣電力股份有限公司所屬中區施工處,擬以質性方法,針對部門主管、員工、外包商,試圖透過訪問的過程來了解當前委外管理機制與績效之關係。 經研究調查與整理,希望對於未來有意研究台電委外管理相關議題者,提供一套初步的評估工具,做為日後業務委外決策參考之依據。 本研究目的為: 一、探討台灣電力公司中區施工處委外管理如何進行。 二、探討台灣電力公司中區施工處在委外管理理論上的分析:監督、控制、信任與資訊。 委外管理的領域和範圍越來越大,像是人力委外、資訊服務委外、勞務應用服務的提供、研發外包和網路外包等(Huang et al. ,2009)。企業功能委外,在過去文獻中,大多數為物流、資訊、製造、或人力委外等,乃至於研發委外,但工程委外管理相關的議題則少人談及。我們將委外的定義為以合約方式將企業運作所需要但並非核心的能力,交由外部服務者,以維持企業運作。本研究擬先以訪談方式調查受訪個案台電中區施工處的委外現況再依據質性深度訪談方式,探討台電中區施工處的現況及其採行委外策略與委外管理機制與績效的相關探討因素。 研究結果顯示:個案公司台電中區施工處的委外管理以內勤單位的委外績效比較低,屬於外勤部門(工務段)的委外管理績效比較高,委外的類型決定管理機制也決定管理績效,不是委外機制決定績效,另為何外勤單位的管理機制績效比較好,是因為外勤部門(工務段)的管理機制比較多,所以績效比較容易顯現。
This study is to explore the relationship between outsourcing management frame and achievement performance of a company. The case study of Central Region Construction Office of Taipower Company was conducted with a qualitative method by interviewing the superintendent, employee and the contractor, which covers (1) the implementation of outsourcing management of Central Region Construction Office of Taipower Company and (2) the analysis of the adoption of outsourcing management theory in Central Region Construction Office of Taipower Company (supervision, control, trust and information). This study aims to propose a preliminary analytic tool to evaluate the policy decision of outsourcing management for the person in charge of relevant issues. The scope of outsourcing management is increasingly expanded, including the entrustment of manpower, information service, labor service providing, research outsourcing and website outsourcing. Most of previous literature focuses on the scope of outsourcing management for material flow, information, manufacturing, manpower or research. However, few previous studies touch the outsourcing management for engineering. This study defined the outsourcing management as giving over the non-core ability operation of a company to outside contractor. The target company was first interviewed to understand the execution of the current outsourcing management and qualitative deep interview was then conducted to explore the key factors among outsourcing strategy, outsourcing management frame and achievement performance. The results show that the outsourcing performance of field-duty department is better than office-duty department because field-duty department has more management frames. In addition, the type of outsourcing decides the management frame as well as achievement performance. Instead, the outsourcing frame is not relevant to achievement performance.