諮商心理師面對諮商關係中跨越界線之經驗研究

本研究欲探討諮商心理師在諮商關係中跨越界線的經驗，主要研究目的為探究諮商心理師面對跨越界線經驗中的覺察反思與因應策略以及界線決策如何反映出諮商師的文化脈絡與諮商信念，本研究以具有諮商心理師執照以及從事諮商心理師工作達三年以上者為研究參與者，研究者在以立意抽樣方法，選擇在諮商實務工作有跨越界線經驗且有意願回答研究問題的諮商師參與研究。在本研究中，從2012年12月到2013年3月共訪6位諮商師，其年資在5年~20年之間，每位受訪者受訪60分鐘。基於研究倫理與研究的信效度，訪談結束後，研究者請每位受訪者進行檢證，力求分析的精確性及深度，並分別撰寫六位研究參與者的初步分析結果與統整分析結果。本研究結果顯示，諮商心理師在跨越界線經驗中的覺察反思與因應策略共可分為三大向度：一、依高度覺察、專業判斷作界線決策；二、跨越界線情境中與案主文化脈絡共構界線；三、尊重機構制度，促進機構系統改變。從界線決策反映出諮商師的文化脈絡與諮商信念中可分為兩大向度：一、跨越界線情境中的界線決策風格：（一）保守預防型、（二）折衷共構型、（三）冒險開創型；二、界線決策中的諮商信念，發現有（一）界線決策中的共構精神；（二）不斷反思、檢視的精神；（三）諮商倫理框架中勇於突破與創新的精神，最後，本研究依據研究結果進行討論並提出建議，以提供諮商機構、諮商心理師、諮商師養成機構、未來研究之建議。關鍵字：跨越界線、文化脈絡、界線決策、諮商關係

關鍵字

跨越界線；文化脈絡；諮商關係；界線決策

並列摘要

This study aims to investigate counselling psychologists’ boundary-crossing experience in a counselling relationship. The main purpose of this study is to investigate counselling psychologists’ awareness, self-reflection, and coping strategies in a boundary-crossing experience, as well as the way counselling psychologists’ cultural context and counselling belief is reflected in boundary decision-making. The research participants are licensed counselling psychologists who have been practicing as professional counselling psychologists for at least three years. Adopting a purposive sampling method, counselling psychologists with boundary-crossing experience in the counselling practice who were willing to answer the research questions were selected to participate in this research. From 2012 December to 2013 March, a total of six counselling psychologists, each with between five to 20 years of counselling experience, were interviewed for this research, and each counselling psychologist was interviewed for 60 minutes. In consideration of research ethics, validity, and reliability, each research participant was invited by the researcher for a post-interview verification to ensure the accuracy and profundity of the analysis. Further, an initial analysis result and a comprehensive analysis result on the six research participants were drafted respectively. The research result showed that counselling psychologists ‘awareness, self-reflection, and coping strategies in the boundary-crossing experience fall into the following three dimensions: 1.Making a boundary decision based on a sufficient self-awareness and professional judgement; 2.Making a joint decision in relation to boundary by incorporating the client’s cultural context in a boundary-crossing scenario; 3.Respecting the institution system and assisting to change the institution system. As reflected in the boundary decision-making, counselling psychologists ’ cultural context and counselling belief fall into the following two dimensions: 1. Styles of decision in a boundary-crossing scenario: conservative and precautionary style, compromising and mutual-decision style; adventurous and pioneering style. 2. Counselling beliefs in the boundary decision-making: the belief of making a mutual decision on the boundary; the belief of continuous sell-reflection and observation; the belief of innovation and breakthrough from the restraint of counselling ethics. In the end, the research, based on the research result, offers suggestions for counselling institutions, counselling psychologists, counselling psychologist educational institutions, and future research.